ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Predictors of Executive Functions in Preschoolers: Findings From the SPLASHY Study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical education exercise improves physical fitness and working memory function: a randomized controlled trial study of Uyghur adolescents in Xinjiang, China.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Pretense and Executive Function: Testing the Roles of Representational Hierarchical Complexity and Embodiment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neurocognitive and Socio-Emotional Profile of Children with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Executive Functions, Social Processing Deficits and Clinical Implications.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Comparative Study of the Development of Executive Functions in Children: Transition from the First Cycle to the Second Cycle of Early Childhood Education.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Quantifying spontaneous infant movements using state-space models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prenatal risk factors for child executive function at 3-5 years of age: the roles of maternal mood, substance use, and socioeconomic adversity in a prospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and executive function in Chinese adolescents.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Risk and Protective Factors for Executive Function in Vulnerable South African Preschool-Age Children.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Child eating behavior predicts body mass index after 1 year: results from the Swiss Preschooler's Health Study (SPLASHY).Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Potential impact of extra education on the development of executive functions within a year in preschool children: an exploratory research.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Childhood lead exposure and sex-based neurobehavioral functioning in adolescence.Neurotoxicology · 2022Article
- The relationship of muscular endurance and coordination and dexterity with behavioral and neuroelectric indices of attention in preschool children.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The association between muscle strength and executive function in children and adolescents: Based on survey evidence in rural areas of China.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Maternal pregnancy diet, postnatal home environment and executive function and behavior in 3- to 4-y-olds.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Article
- Prenatal Exposure to Tobacco and Offspring Neurocognitive Development in the Healthy Start Study.The Journal of pediatrics · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Executive functions (EFs) have been reported to play a crucial role in children's development, affecting their academic achievement, health, and quality of life. This study examined individual and interpersonal predictors for EFs in 555 typically developing preschool children aged 2-6 years. Children were recruited from 84 child care centers in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland within the Swiss Preschoolers' Health Study (SPLASHY). A total of 20 potential predictors were assessed at the first measurement (T1). These included eight demographic/biological predictors, such as socioeconomic status, preterm birth, physical activity, and motor skills; six psychological predictors, such as hyperactivity, visual perception, and emotionality; and six interpersonal predictors, such as parenting style and stress, presence of siblings, and days spent in the child care center. The predictive value of these variables on EFs 1 year later (T2) was assessed using both standard multiple regression analysis and penalized regression to avoid overfitting due to the number of potential predictors. Female sex (β = 0.14), socio-economic status (β = 0.15), fine motor skills (β = 0.17), visual perception at T1 (β = 0.16), and EFs at T1 (β = 0.30) were all associated with EFs at T2, exhibiting small to medium effect sizes. All predictors together accounted for 31% of the variability in EFs. However, none of the interpersonal predictors were significant. Thus, we conclude that most of the factors that can predict EFs in preschool age are individual variables, and these tend to be more difficult to influence than interpersonal factors. In fact, children from families with low socio-economic status may be particularly vulnerable to poor EFs. Furthermore, encouraging fine motor skills early in life may support the development of EFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.