Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30420823›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Predictors of Executive Functions in Preschoolers: Findings From the SPLASHY Study.

Annina E Zysset, Tanja H Kakebeeke, Nadine Messerli-Bürgy, Andrea H Meyer, Kerstin Stülb, Claudia S Leeger-Aschmann, Einat A Schmutz, Amar Arhab, Jardena J Puder, Susi Kriemler and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Neurocognitive and Socio-Emotional Profile of Children with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Executive Functions, Social Processing Deficits and Clinical Implications.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annina E ZyssetChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tanja H KakebeekeChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nadine Messerli-BürgyDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Andrea H MeyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Kerstin StülbDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Claudia S Leeger-AschmannEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Einat A SchmutzEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Amar ArhabObstetric service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jardena J PuderObstetric service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Susi KriemlerEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simone MunschDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Oskar G JenniChild Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) have been reported to play a crucial role in children's development, affecting their academic achievement, health, and quality of life. This study examined individual and interpersonal predictors for EFs in 555 typically developing preschool children aged 2-6 years. Children were recruited from 84 child care centers in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland within the Swiss Preschoolers' Health Study (SPLASHY). A total of 20 potential predictors were assessed at the first measurement (T1). These included eight demographic/biological predictors, such as socioeconomic status, preterm birth, physical activity, and motor skills; six psychological predictors, such as hyperactivity, visual perception, and emotionality; and six interpersonal predictors, such as parenting style and stress, presence of siblings, and days spent in the child care center. The predictive value of these variables on EFs 1 year later (T2) was assessed using both standard multiple regression analysis and penalized regression to avoid overfitting due to the number of potential predictors. Female sex (β = 0.14), socio-economic status (β = 0.15), fine motor skills (β = 0.17), visual perception at T1 (β = 0.16), and EFs at T1 (β = 0.30) were all associated with EFs at T2, exhibiting small to medium effect sizes. All predictors together accounted for 31% of the variability in EFs. However, none of the interpersonal predictors were significant. Thus, we conclude that most of the factors that can predict EFs in preschool age are individual variables, and these tend to be more difficult to influence than interpersonal factors. In fact, children from families with low socio-economic status may be particularly vulnerable to poor EFs. Furthermore, encouraging fine motor skills early in life may support the development of EFs.

Indexed as

cognitive functioningexecutive functionsmotor skillspredictorspreschoolerssexsocio economic statusSPLASHY

Identifiers

PMID30420823
PMCPMC6216414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.