Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30420799›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2018

Behavioral and Neurophysiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Fronto-Temporal Dementia.

Roberta Ferrucci, Simona Mrakic-Sposta, Simona Gardini, Fabiana Ruggiero, Maurizio Vergari, Francesca Mameli, Andrea Arighi, Marco Spallazzi, Federica Barocco, Giovanni Michelini and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The role of noninvasive brain stimulation for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta FerrucciFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Simona Mrakic-SpostaFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Simona GardiniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Fabiana RuggieroFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio VergariFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Francesca MameliFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Andrea ArighiFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Marco SpallazziDementia Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Federica BaroccoDementia Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giovanni MicheliniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Anna Margherita PietroboniFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Laura GhezziFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio Giulio FumagalliFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giordano D'UrsoUniversity of Naples "Federico II"-AOU, Naples, Italy.
Paolo CaffarraDementia Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Elio ScarpiniFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Alberto Priori"Aldo Ravelli" Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy.
Sara MarcegliaFondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale di Parma · ITFerrari (Italy) · ITUniversity of Parma · ITInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) is the clinical-diagnostic term that is now preferred to describe patients with a range of progressive dementia syndromes associated with focal atrophy of the frontal and anterior temporal cerebral regions. Currently available FTD medications have been used to control behavioral symptoms, even though they are ineffective in some patients, expensive and may induce adverse effects. Alternative therapeutic approaches are worth pursuing, such as non-invasive brain stimulation with transcranial direct current (tDCS). tDCS has been demonstrated to influence neuronal excitability and reported to enhance cognitive performance in dementia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether applying Anodal tDCS (2 mA intensity, 20 min) over the fronto-temporal cortex bilaterally in five consecutive daily sessions would improve cognitive performance and behavior symptoms in FTD patients, also considering the neuromodulatory effect of stimulation on cortical electrical activity measured through EEG. We recruited 13 patients with FTD and we tested the effect of Anodal and Sham (i.e., placebo) tDCS in two separate experimental sessions. In each session, at baseline (T0), after 5 consecutive days (T1), after 1 week (T2), and after 4 weeks (T3) from the end of the treatment, cognitive and behavioral functions were tested. EEG (21 electrodes, 10-20 international system) was recorded for 5 min with eyes closed at the same time points in nine patients. The present findings showed that Anodal tDCS applied bilaterally over the fronto-temporal cortex significantly improves (1) neuropsychiatric symptoms (as measured by the neuropsychiatric inventory, NPI) in FTD patients immediately after tDCS treatment, and (2) simple visual reaction times (sVRTs) up to 1 month after tDCS treatment. These cognitive improvements significantly correlate with the time course of the slow EEG oscillations (delta and theta bands) measured at the same time points. Even though further studies on larger samples are needed, these findings support the effectiveness of Anodal tDCS over the fronto-temporal regions in FTD on attentional processes that might be correlated to a normalized EEG low-frequency pattern.

Indexed as

EEGfronto-temporal dementianeuromodulationneuropsychiatric inventoryreaction timetranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID30420799
PMCPMC6215856
OpenAlexW2898817754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.