ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2018
Fully-Automatic Synapse Prediction and Validation on a Large Data Set.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A connectome and analysis of the adulteLife · 2020Pooled it
- Spatial and morphological organization of mitochondria in neurons across a connectome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular organization of central cholinergic synapses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- WASPSYN: A Challenge for Domain Adaptive Synapse Detection in Microwasp Brain Connectomes.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- SynapseCLR: Uncovering features of synapses in primary visual cortex through contrastive representation learning.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Finding the right type of cell.eLife · 2023Article
- Local shape descriptors for neuron segmentation.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Rapid reconstruction of neural circuits using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy.eLife · 2022Article
- How innovations in methodology offer new prospects for volume electron microscopy.Journal of microscopy · 2022Review
- Edge-colored directed subgraph enumeration on the connectome.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Automated Synapse Detection Method for Cerebellar Connectomics.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022Article
- FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Article
- RealNeuralNetworks.jl: An Integrated Julia Package for Skeletonization, Morphological Analysis, and Synaptic Connectivity Analysis of Terabyte-Scale 3D Neural Segmentations.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Automatic classification and neurotransmitter prediction of synapses in electron microscopy.Biological imaging · 2022Article
- Automatic detection of synaptic partners in a whole-brain Drosophila electron microscopy data set.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Light microscopy based approach for mapping connectivity with molecular specificity.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics.Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracting a connectome from an electron microscopy (EM) data set requires identification of neurons and determination of connections (synapses) between neurons. As manual extraction of this information is very time-consuming, there has been extensive research efforts to automatically segment the neurons to help guide and eventually replace manual tracing. Until recently, there has been comparatively little research on automatic detection of the actual synapses between neurons. This discrepancy can, in part, be attributed to several factors: obtaining neuronal shapes is a prerequisite for the first step in extracting a connectome, manual tracing is much more time-consuming than annotating synapses, and neuronal contact area can be used as a proxy for synapses in determining connections. However, recent research has demonstrated that contact area alone is not a sufficient predictor of a synaptic connection. Moreover, as segmentation improved, we observed that synapse annotation consumes a more significant fraction of overall reconstruction time (upwards of 50% of total effort). This ratio will only get worse as segmentation improves, gating the overall possible speed-up. Therefore, we address this problem by developing algorithms that automatically detect presynaptic neurons and their postsynaptic partners. In particular, presynaptic structures are detected using a U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN), and postsynaptic partners are detected using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) with features conditioned on the local segmentation. This work is novel because it requires minimal amount of training, leverages advances in image segmentation directly, and provides a complete solution for polyadic synapse detection. We further introduce novel metrics to evaluate our algorithm on connectomes of meaningful size. When applied to the output of our method on EM data from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.