Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30420699›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Pathway-based subnetworks enable cross-disease biomarker discovery.

Syed Haider, Cindy Q Yao, Vicky S Sabine, Michal Grzadkowski, Vincent Stimper, Maud H W Starmans, Jianxin Wang, Francis Nguyen, Nathalie C Moon, Xihui Lin and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteogenomic discovery ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Syed HaiderInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada. Syed.Haider@oicr.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-5480
Cindy Q YaoInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Vicky S SabineDiagnostic Development Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Michal GrzadkowskiInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Vincent StimperInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Maud H W StarmansInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Jianxin WangInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Francis NguyenInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Nathalie C MoonInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Xihui LinInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Camilla DrakeDiagnostic Development Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Cheryl A CrozierDiagnostic Development Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Cassandra L BrookesCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annette HasenburgUniversity Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Dirk G KiebackKlinikum Vest Medical Center, Marl, Germany.
Christos J MarkopoulosAthens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Luc Y DirixSt. Augustinus Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Caroline SeynaeveErasmus Medical Center-Daniel den Hoed, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel W ReaCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Arek KasprzykInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-0177
Pietro Lio'Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, United Kingdom.
John M S BartlettDiagnostic Development Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada. John.Bartlett@oicr.on.ca.
Paul C BoutrosInformatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada. paul.boutros@oicr.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-7520
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CACancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBAthens Medical Center · GRKlinikum Vest · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers lie at the heart of precision medicine. Surprisingly, while rapid genomic profiling is becoming ubiquitous, the development of biomarkers usually involves the application of bespoke techniques that cannot be directly applied to other datasets. There is an urgent need for a systematic methodology to create biologically-interpretable molecular models that robustly predict key phenotypes. Here we present SIMMS (Subnetwork Integration for Multi-Modal Signatures): an algorithm that fragments pathways into functional modules and uses these to predict phenotypes. We apply SIMMS to multiple data types across five diseases, and in each it reproducibly identifies known and novel subtypes, and makes superior predictions to the best bespoke approaches. To demonstrate its ability on a new dataset, we profile 33 genes/nodes of the PI3K pathway in 1734 FFPE breast tumors and create a four-subnetwork prediction model. This model out-performs a clinically-validated molecular test in an independent cohort of 1742 patients. SIMMS is generic and enables systematic data integration for robust biomarker discovery.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysBenchmarkingBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationHumansNeoplasmsSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30420699
PMCPMC6232113
OpenAlexW2899821983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.