Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30420349›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol.

Reena Devi, Julienne Meyer, Jay Banerjee, Claire Goodman, John Raymond Fletcher Gladman, Tom Dening, Neil Chadborn, Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith, Annabelle Long, Adeela Usman and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Reena DeviDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Julienne MeyerSchool of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK.
Jay BanerjeeUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Claire GoodmanCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
John Raymond Fletcher GladmanDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tom DeningDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Neil ChadbornDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1368-7983
Kathryn Hinsliff-SmithDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Annabelle LongDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adeela UsmanDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gemma HousleyHealth Analytics and Informatics, East Midlands Academic Health Science Network, Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Clive BowmanSchool of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4558-4981
Finbarr MartinAgeing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Phillipa LoganDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah LewisDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adam Lee GordonDivision of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-9853

Funding

Department of Health 11/1021/02Department of Health HTA/12/192/10Department of Health HTA/13/75/01The Dunhill Medical Trust FOP1/0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis protocol describes a study of a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) to support implementation and delivery of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in UK care homes. The QIC will be formed of health and social care professionals working in and with care homes and will be supported by clinical, quality improvement and research specialists. QIC participants will receive quality improvement training using the Model for Improvement. An appreciative approach to working with care homes will be encouraged through facilitated shared learning events, quality improvement coaching and assistance with project evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The QIC will be delivered across a range of partnering organisations which plan, deliver and evaluate health services for care home residents in four local areas of one geographical region. A realist evaluation framework will be used to develop a programme theory informing how QICs are thought to work, for whom and in what ways when used to implement and deliver CGA in care homes. Data collection will involve participant observations of the QIC over 18 months, and interviews/focus groups with QIC participants to iteratively define, refine, test or refute the programme theory. Two researchers will analyse field notes, and interview/focus group transcripts, coding data using inductive and deductive analysis. The key findings and linked programme theory will be summarised as context-mechanism-outcome configurations describing what needs to be in place to use QICs to implement service improvements in care homes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was reviewed by the National Health Service Health Research Authority (London Bromley research ethics committee reference: 205840) and the University of Nottingham (reference: LT07092016) ethics committees. Both determined that the Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes study was a service and quality improvement initiative. Findings will be shared nationally and internationally through conference presentations, publication in peer-reviewed journals, a graphical illustration and a dissemination video.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGeriatric AssessmentHomes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedFrailtyHumansImplementation ScienceQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementUnited Kingdomorganisation of health servicesquality In health care

Identifiers

PMID30420349
PMCPMC6252778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.