Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30420005›Full record

SynthesiseLife2018

Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias.

Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Shinichi Nakagawa, Moisès Sánchez-Fortún, Dominic A Martin, Sukanya Ramani, Antje Girndt, Veronika Bókony, Bart Kempenaers, András Liker, David F Westneat and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Quantifying research waste in ecology.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. A meta-analysis on the evolution of the Lombard effect reveals that amplitude adjustments are a widespread vertebrate mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Why don't all animals avoid inbreeding?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
  13. Behavioural ecology in the twenty-first century.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Not so social in old age: demography as one driver of decreasing sociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alfredo Sánchez-TójarEvolutionary Biology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2886-0649
Shinichi NakagawaSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sidney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-5182
Moisès Sánchez-FortúnEvolutionary Biology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Dominic A MartinDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7197-2278
Sukanya RamaniEvolutionary Biology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Antje GirndtEvolutionary Biology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9558-1201
Veronika BókonyLendület Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2136-5346
Bart KempenaersDepartment of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-5458
András LikerMTA-PE Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.
David F WestneatDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-8096
Terry BurkeDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3848-1244
Julia SchroederEvolutionary Biology Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The status signalling hypothesis aims to explain within-species variation in ornamentation by suggesting that some ornaments signal dominance status. Here, we use multilevel meta-analytic models to challenge the textbook example of this hypothesis, the black bib of male house sparrows (

Indexed as

Publication BiasAnimalsFeathersHierarchy, SocialMaleMultilevel AnalysisSparrowsbadge of statusdominanceecologymeta-analysisornamentPasser domesticuspublication bias

Identifiers

PMID30420005
PMCPMC6234027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.