Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419916›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018

Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller.

A H Butt, E Rovini, C Dolciotti, G De Petris, P Bongioanni, M C Carboncini, F Cavallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Video-Based Data-Driven Models for Diagnosing Movement Disorders: Review and Future Directions.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation for Parkinsonian Bradykinesia by deep learning modeling of kinematic parameters.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A H ButtBioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
E RoviniBioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
C DolciottiInstitute of Information Science and Technologies National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
G De PetrisTelecom Italia, WHITE Lab (Wellbeing and Health Innovative Technologies Lab), Pisa, Italy.
P BongioanniSevere Acquired Brain Injuries Department Section, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
M C CarbonciniSevere Acquired Brain Injuries Department Section, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
F CavalloBioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy. filippo.cavallo@santannapisa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-5033

Funding

Regione Toscana FAS SALUTE 2014 (CUP J52I16000170002)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation/supination, postural tremor) were used to evaluate the characteristics described in MDS-UPDRSIII. Clinical ratings according to the MDS/UPDRS-section III items were used as target. For that purpose, 16 participants with PD and 12 healthy people were recruited in Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy. The participants performed standardized hand movements with camera-based marker. Time and frequency domain features related to velocity, angle, amplitude, and frequency were derived from the LMC data.

resultsDifferent machine learning techniques were used to classify the PD and healthy subjects by comparing the subjective scale given by neurologists against the predicted diagnosis from the machine learning classifiers. Feature selection methods were used to choose the most significant features. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were trained with tenfold cross validation with selected features. The maximum obtained classification accuracy with LR was 70.37%; the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.831. The obtained classification accuracy with NB was 81.4%, with AUC of 0.811. The obtained classification accuracy with SVM was 74.07%, with AUC of 0.675.

conclusionsResults revealed that the system did not return clinically meaningful data for measuring postural tremor in PwPD. In addition, it showed limited potential to measure the forearm pronation/supination. In contrast, for finger tapping and hand opening/closing, the derived parameters showed statistical and clinical significance. Future studies should continue to validate the LMC as updated versions of the software are developed. The obtained results support the fact that most of the set of selected features contributed significantly to classify the PwPD and healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBayes TheoremExerciseFemaleFingersHandHumansItalyMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMotionFeatures selectionLeap MotionMotion analysisObjective diagnosis in ParkinsonSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID30419916
PMCPMC6233603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.