Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419903›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2018

Biomedical engineer's guide to the clinical aspects of intensive care mechanical ventilation.

Vincent J Major, Yeong Shiong Chiew, Geoffrey M Shaw, J Geoffrey Chase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-invasive over-distension measurements: data driven vs model-based.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. GlasVent-The Rapidly Deployable Emergency Ventilator.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent J MajorDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. vincent.major@nyulangone.org.
Yeong Shiong ChiewSchool of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Geoffrey M ShawDepartment of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Geoffrey ChaseCentre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 13/213Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2016/TK03/MUSM/03/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation is an essential therapy to support critically ill respiratory failure patients. Current standards of care consist of generalised approaches, such as the use of positive end expiratory pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (PEEP-FiO DISCUSSION: This review presents the significant clinical aspects and variables of ventilation management, the potential risks associated with suboptimal ventilation management, and a review of the major recent attempts to improve ventilation in the context of these variables. The unique aspect of this review is a focus on these key elements relevant to engineering new approaches. In particular, the need for ventilation strategies which consider, and directly account for, the significant differences in patient condition, disease etiology, and progression within patients is demonstrated with the subsequent requirement for optimal ventilation strategies to titrate for patient- and time-specific conditions.

conclusionEngineered, protective lung strategies that can directly account for and manage inter- and intra-patient variability thus offer great potential to improve both individual care, as well as cohort clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomedical EngineeringCritical CareAnimalsCritical IllnessHumansLungLung InjuryOscillometryOxygenPositive-Pressure RespirationPressureRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRiskTidal VolumeVentilators, MechanicalOxygenIntensive careMechanical ventilationModel-based treatmentPatient-specific ventilationProtective lung strategiesRespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID30419903
PMCPMC6233601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.