Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419890›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2018

Factors influencing the use of the "not for generic substitution" mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners.

Virgil Beauvais, Annabelle Marque, Guillaume Ferté, Jan Chrusciel, Julie Souille, Pierre Nazeyrollas, Stéphane Sanchez

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Virgil BeauvaisGeneral Practice, 10000, Troyes, France.
Annabelle MarqueEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, 10000, Troyes, France.
Guillaume FertéGeneral Practice, 10000, Troyes, France.
Jan ChruscielMedical Information Department, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, 10000, Troyes, France.
Julie SouilleEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, 51092, Reims, France.
Pierre NazeyrollasCardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, 51092, Reims, France.
Stéphane SanchezMedical Information Department, Centre Hospitalier de Troyes, 10000, Troyes, France. Stephane.sanchez@ch-troyes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0925-6948
Centre Hospitalier de Troyes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneric drug substitution is a public health policy challenge with high economic potential. Generic drugs are generally cheaper than brand-name drugs. Drugs are a significant part of the total health expenditure, especially in ambulatory care. We conducted a cross-sectional study with general practitioners in the Champagne-Ardenne region to determine physician-related factors and beliefs causing doctors to use the Not for Generic Substitution (NGS) mention.

methodsQuestionnaires were sent to General Practitioners (GPs) practicing in Champagne-Ardenne via 3 shipments, from January 2015 to May 2015. Prescriber characteristics and beliefs influencing the use of the NGS mention were assessed for frequent (≥ 5%) and less frequent (< 5%) users of the NGS mention.

resultsFactors associated with above average NGS mention use in bivariate analysis included patient comorbidity, polypharmacy, a concern that generic and brand-name drugs are not bioequivalent and belief in higher efficacy of the brand name drug. The use of an e-prescribing system (EPS) and medical practice in rural areas appeared to be associated with lower use of NGS mention in bivariate analysis but not in multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, patient request was associated with a higher use of the NGS mention (NGS ≥ 5%, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 2.52; 95% CI = [1.46-4.35]; p = 0.001), which was also linked to patient age over 65 (NGS ≥ 5%, aOR = 2.33; 95% CI = [1.03-5.30]; p = 0.04). The NGS mention was often used for drugs where substitution is debated in the literature (thyroid hormones, antiepileptic drugs).

conclusionThis work highlights the involvement of the doctor-patient pair for the use of the NGS mention. Patient request was the major reason for using the NGS mention, even though it was not always endorsed by prescribers. Further studies are needed to assess patient views on generic drugs and drug substitution, accounting for their health status and socio-economic condition, to help improve the relevance of the information available to them.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsDrugs, GenericDrug SubstitutionFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTherapeutic EquivalencyDrugs, GenericGeneric drugsNot for generic substitutionPrescribing

Identifiers

PMID30419890
PMCPMC6233580
OpenAlexW2901686653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.