Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419875›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Identifying the most suitable treatment for depression based on patients' attachment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of supportive-expressive vs. supportive treatments.

Sigal Zilcha-Mano, Tohar Dolev, Liat Leibovich, Jacques P Barber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02728557 (The Roles of the Therapeutic Alliance in Understanding the Effects of Attachment Orientations on Outcome in Psychotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02728557 nacompletednot on this map

The Roles of the Therapeutic Alliance in Understanding the Effects of Attachment Orientations on Outcome in Psychotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HaifaRan2016 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsSupportive-Expressive Therapy, Supportive Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sigal Zilcha-ManoThe Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel. sigalzil@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5645-4429
Tohar DolevThe Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
Liat LeibovichThe Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
Jacques P BarberThe Gorden F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, New York, USA.
Carmel (Israel) · ILAdelphi University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of one intervention that can cure all patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), the leading cause of disability worldwide, increased attention has been focused on selecting the best treatment based on patient characteristics. Theory-driven hypotheses for selecting the best treatments have not yet been adequately investigated. The present study tested the a priory hypothesis that attachment orientations may determine whether patients benefit more from a treatment where alliance provides a facilitative environment for the treatment to work, as in the case of supportive-expressive psychotherapy, vs. where alliance is conceptualized as an active ingredient in itself, as in the case of supportive psychotherapy. METHOD/

designTo test the hypothesis that attachment orientation moderates the effect of treatment condition on outcome, we conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT). One hundred patients are randomized to 16 sessions of either supportive-expressive or supportive psychotherapy for MDD, conducted by experienced psychologists. The primary outcome is change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported depressive and other symptoms, psychological and interpersonal functioning, quality of life, and the presence of the diagnosis of depression. Additional measures include hormonal levels, motion synchrony, and acoustic attributes, performance on cognitive tasks, and narrative material (collected from the sessions and from interviews). DISCUSSION: The RCT will expand our understanding of how the outcome of treatment can be optimized by identifying the most promising role of alliance in treatment, based on patients' pre-treatment attachment orientation. Results will contribute to the ongoing theoretical debate concerning the differential efficacy of various psychotherapeutic approaches for patients with different attachment orientations. The RCT will also contribute to progress toward personalized treatment by informing therapists about which of two approaches are most effective with patients based on their attachment styles.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02728557 submitted on the 15.3.16.

fundingThe Israel Science Foundation. Trial status: Recruitment is ongoing.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTherapeutic AllianceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAllianceAttachmentPersonalized treatmentPsychodynamic treatmentSupportive expressive treatment

Identifiers

PMID30419875
PMCPMC6233496
OpenAlexW2901638356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.