ArticleBMC psychiatry2018
Identifying the most suitable treatment for depression based on patients' attachment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of supportive-expressive vs. supportive treatments.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02728557 (The Roles of the Therapeutic Alliance in Understanding the Effects of Attachment Orientations on Outcome in Psychotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Roles of the Therapeutic Alliance in Understanding the Effects of Attachment Orientations on Outcome in Psychotherapy
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression.BMC psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Trait-Like and State-Like Oxytocin: A Biomarker of Alliance in Patients with Depression and Borderline Personality Disorder.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Change May Begin before the Therapist and Patient Ever Meet: Pretreatment Alliance Changes Predict Clinical Outcomes.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2025Article
- Contrasting Individual-Specific Resilience and Compensation Personalization Frameworks: The Case of Rumination.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- More than Meets the "I": A Panoramic View of Epistemic Trust in Psychotherapy.Psychopathology · 2025Article
- Identifying who benefits most from supportive versus expressive techniques in psychotherapy for depression: Moderators of within- versus between-individual effects.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2024Article
- Investigating movement synchrony in therapeutic settings using socially interactive agents: an experimental toolkit.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- How Plan Analysis can inform the construction of a therapeutic relationship.Journal of clinical psychology · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review and Lived-Experience Panel Analysis of Hopefulness in Youth Depression Treatment.Adolescent research review · 2022Review
- Patient and Therapist In-Session Cortisol as Predictor of Post-Session Patient Reported Affect.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Relationships of biomedical beliefs about depression to treatment-related expectancies in a treatment-seeking sample.Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the absence of one intervention that can cure all patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), the leading cause of disability worldwide, increased attention has been focused on selecting the best treatment based on patient characteristics. Theory-driven hypotheses for selecting the best treatments have not yet been adequately investigated. The present study tested the a priory hypothesis that attachment orientations may determine whether patients benefit more from a treatment where alliance provides a facilitative environment for the treatment to work, as in the case of supportive-expressive psychotherapy, vs. where alliance is conceptualized as an active ingredient in itself, as in the case of supportive psychotherapy. METHOD/
designTo test the hypothesis that attachment orientation moderates the effect of treatment condition on outcome, we conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT). One hundred patients are randomized to 16 sessions of either supportive-expressive or supportive psychotherapy for MDD, conducted by experienced psychologists. The primary outcome is change in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported depressive and other symptoms, psychological and interpersonal functioning, quality of life, and the presence of the diagnosis of depression. Additional measures include hormonal levels, motion synchrony, and acoustic attributes, performance on cognitive tasks, and narrative material (collected from the sessions and from interviews). DISCUSSION: The RCT will expand our understanding of how the outcome of treatment can be optimized by identifying the most promising role of alliance in treatment, based on patients' pre-treatment attachment orientation. Results will contribute to the ongoing theoretical debate concerning the differential efficacy of various psychotherapeutic approaches for patients with different attachment orientations. The RCT will also contribute to progress toward personalized treatment by informing therapists about which of two approaches are most effective with patients based on their attachment styles.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02728557 submitted on the 15.3.16.
fundingThe Israel Science Foundation. Trial status: Recruitment is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.