Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419863›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients receiving radical resection for colorectal cancer.

Fang Wang, Wenzhuo He, Chang Jiang, Guifang Guo, Bin Ke, Qiangsheng Dai, Jianting Long, Liangping Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651, Dongfengdong Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Wenzhuo HeSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfengdong Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Chang JiangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfengdong Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Guifang GuoSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfengdong Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Bin KeDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58, the 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Qiangsheng DaiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58, the 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jianting LongDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58, the 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China. longjianting@163.com.
Liangping XiaSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfengdong Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China. xialiangping@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572409Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (CN) 2015A030313010Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 1563000305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are conventional inflammation-based scores for colorectal cancer (CRC). The systemic inflammation score (SIS) has been shown to be more informative than the mGPS in CRC. The albumin-NLR, composed of albumin and the NLR, can also be a candidate for a valuable inflammation score. However, about the utility of the mGPS, SIS, and albumin-NLR for CRC patients who have received radical resections remains unclear.

methodsThis study enrolled 877 CRC patients, who underwent radical surgical resection between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014. The prognostic values of the mGPS, SIS, and albumin-NLR were compared by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression modelling, and the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC).

resultsIn the Kaplan-Meier analysis, all three inflammation scores were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in the group including all the patients (mGPS, p = 0.016; SIS, p < 0.001; albumin-NLR, p = 0.007) and in the left-sided colon tumour subgroup (mGPS, p = 0.029; SIS p = 0.0013; albumin-NLR, p = 0.001). In the right-sided colon tumour subgroup, only the albumin-NLR was associated with OS (p = 0.048). The albumin-NLR was the only independent prognostic factor of the three scores for OS in the multivariate survival analysis.

conclusionsThe albumin-NLR outperformed both the SIS and mGPS in predicting OS in CRC patients undergoing radical resection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInflammationKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeutrophilsBiomarkersAlbumin-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioAnd intratumoural chronic inflammatory cellColorectal cancerModified-Glasgow prognostic scoreRadical resectionSystemic inflammation score

Identifiers

PMID30419863
PMCPMC6233268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.