Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419861›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Testing for minimal residual disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Europe: a clinician survey.

Arnaud Pigneux, Pau Montesinos, Ze Cong, Xinke Zhang, Anja K Pownell, Heather Wieffer, Jan McKendrick, Monika Brüggemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Arnaud PigneuxService d'Hématologie Clinique et Thérapie Cellulaire, Univ.Bordeaux, INSERM U035, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. arnaud.pigneux@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Pau MontesinosHematology Department (Torre F, planta 7), Hospital Universitario La Fe, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell, 106 CP, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Ze CongAmgen Inc, 1 Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Xinke ZhangAmgen Inc, 1 Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Anja K PownellPRMA Consulting, Linea House, Harvest Crescent, Ancells Business Park, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 2UZ, UK.
Heather WiefferPRMA Consulting, Linea House, Harvest Crescent, Ancells Business Park, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 2UZ, UK.
Jan McKendrickPRMA Consulting, Linea House, Harvest Crescent, Ancells Business Park, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 2UZ, UK.
Monika BrüggemannSektion für Hämatologische Spezialdiagnostik, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Langer Segen 8-10, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Amgen (United States) · USInserm · FRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction/consolidation chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor for subsequent relapse and mortality. Accordingly, European clinical guidelines and protocols recommend testing patients who achieve a complete hematological remission (CR) for MRD for the purpose of risk stratification. The aim of this study was to provide quantitative information regarding real-world clinical practice for MRD testing in five European countries.

methodsA web-based survey was conducted in March/April 2017 in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. The survey was developed after consultation with specialist clinicians and a review of published literature. Eligible clinicians (20 per country; 23 in Spain) were board-certified in hemato-oncology or hematology, had at least five years' experience in their current role after training, had treated at least two patients with B-cell precursor ALL in the 12 months before the survey or at least five patients in the last five years, and had experience of testing for MRD in clinical practice.

resultsMRD testing is now standard practice in the treatment of adult ALL across the five European countries, with common use of recent treatment protocols which specify testing. Respondents estimated that, among clinicians in their country who conduct MRD testing, 73% of patients in first CR (CR1) and 63% of patients in second or later CR (CR2+) are tested for MRD. The median time point reported as most commonly used for the first MRD test, to establish risk status and to determine a treatment plan was four weeks after the start of induction therapy. The timing and frequency of tests is similar across countries. An average of four or five post-CR1 tests per patient in the 12 months after the first MRD test were reported across countries.

conclusionsThis comprehensive study of MRD testing patterns shows consistent practice across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK with respect to the timing and frequency of MRD testing, aligning with use of national protocols. MRD testing is used in clinical practice also in patients who reach CR2 + .

Indexed as

AdultClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInternetMaleNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisALLCross-sectional surveyMinimal residual diseaseMRD testing

Identifiers

PMID30419861
PMCPMC6233570
OpenAlexW2900697450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.