Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419853›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Melania Elena Pop-Tudose, Dana Popescu-Spineni, Petru Armean, Ioan Victor Pop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melania Elena Pop-TudoseDepartment of Medical Genetics, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Pasteur Louis Street No.6, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. melaniaelena_tudose@yahoo.ro.
Dana Popescu-SpineniDepartment of Specific Disciplines, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Petru ArmeanDepartment of Specific Disciplines, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Ioan Victor PopDepartment of Medical Genetics, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Pasteur Louis Street No.6, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDown Syndrome screening test is a bridge between knowledge and uncertainty, safety and risk, unpredictability and desire to know in order to gain control. It may be accepted either not to have a baby with Down syndrome, or to prepare to have a baby with this condition. Every woman should understand that it is an option and should be encouraged to make their own decisions based on information and personal values. The implications and possible subsequent scenarios differentiate this type of test from the common biochemical tests performed during pregnancy, of paramount importance being the right to make informed choices. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitude towards prenatal Down syndrome screening in order to asses to what extent the Romanian women make informed choices in this area.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out that included 530 postpartum women, clients of Romania' south-east region maternities, during April-September 2016. The level of knowledge and the attitude concerning the Down syndrome screening were evaluated using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0.

results48.1% of the women have never heard about any tests for Down Syndrome and from those 51.9% who have heard, only 14.2% made an informed choice, 78.9% had a positive attitude for screening, 88% were classified as having insufficient knowledge and 68.3% made a value-consistent decision to accept or decline prenatal screening. A higher knowledge level was associated with a higher education level and the urban residence. The information satisfaction and confidence in the overall value of screening were predictive factors of positive attitude. More informed choices were made by women monitored by an obstetrician in a private practice.

conclusionsThe prenatal screening tests for Down Syndrome were mostly unknown and the women who accepted or not to perform a test were insufficiently knowledgeable that means that the ethical concept of the informed choice wasn't followed. In our opinion the Romanian Health System needs to improve the antenatal policy by developing an adequate information strategy at the reproductive population level based on a network of trained specialists.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingDown SyndromeFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRomaniaSocial ValuesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudeDown syndromeInformed consentKnowledgePrenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID30419853
PMCPMC6233289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.