Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419813›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018

The validation of the Hungarian version of the ID-migraine questionnaire.

Éva Csépány, Marianna Tóth, Tamás Gyüre, Máté Magyar, György Bozsik, Dániel Bereczki, Gabriella Juhász, Csaba Ertsey

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Éva CsépánySzentágothai János Doctoral School of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Üllői u. 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Marianna TóthDepartment of Neurology, Vaszary Kolos Hospital, Petőfi Sándor u. 26-28, Esztergom, 2500, Hungary.
Tamás GyüreSzentágothai János Doctoral School of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Üllői u. 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Máté MagyarSzentágothai János Doctoral School of Neurosciences, Semmelweis University, Üllői u. 26, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
György BozsikDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Dániel BereczkiDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Gabriella JuhászSE-NAP2 Genetic Brain Imaging Migraine Research Group, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, Budapest, 1089, Hungary.
Csaba ErtseyDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary. csaba.ertsey@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite its high prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. ID-Migraine is a short, self-administrated questionnaire, originally developed in English by Lipton et al. and later validated in several languages. Our goal was to validate the Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire.

methodsPatients visiting two headache specialty services were enrolled. Diagnoses were made by headache specialists according to the ICHD-3beta diagnostic criteria. There were 309 clinically diagnosed migraineurs among the 380 patients. Among the 309 migraineurs, 190 patients had only migraine, and 119 patients had other headache beside migraine, namely: 111 patients had tension type headache, 3 patients had cluster headache, 4 patients had medication overuse headache and one patient had headache associated with sexual activity also. Among the 380 patients, 257 had only a single type headache whereas 123 patients had multiple types of headache. Test-retest reliability of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire was studied in 40 patients.

resultsThe validity features of the Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine questionnaire were the following: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), specificity 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.55), positive predictive value 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91), negative predictive value 0.65 (95% CI, 0.5-0.78), missclassification error 0.15 (95% CI, 0.12-0.19). The kappa coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.77.

conclusionThe Hungarian version of the ID-Migraine Questionnaire had adequate sensitivity, positive predictive value and misclassification error, but a low specificity and somewhat low negative predictive value.

Indexed as

TranslatingAdultCluster HeadacheFemaleHeadacheHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansHungaryLanguageMaleMigraine DisordersReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTension-Type HeadacheHungarian versionID-migraine questionnaireMigraineValidity features

Identifiers

PMID30419813
PMCPMC6755580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.