Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419129›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2019

Performance of a Multigene Genomic Classifier in Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology: A Prospective Blinded Multicenter Study.

David L Steward, Sally E Carty, Rebecca S Sippel, Samantha Peiling Yang, Julie A Sosa, Jennifer A Sipos, James J Figge, Susan Mandel, Bryan R Haugen, Kenneth D Burman and 22 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 216 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Molecular Diagnostics and [Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. BRAFDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

David L StewardDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sally E CartyDivision of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania.
Rebecca S SippelDivision of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Samantha Peiling YangEndocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Julie A SosaSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer A SiposDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus.
James J FiggeDiabetes & Endocrine Care, St Peter's Health Partners, Rensselaer, New York.
Susan MandelDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Bryan R HaugenDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Kenneth D BurmanDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Zubair W BalochDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ricardo V LloydDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Raja R SeethalaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
William E GoodingBiostatistics Facility, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Simion I ChioseaDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Cristiane Gomes-LimaDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Robert L FerrisDepartments of Otolaryngology and Immunology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jessica M FolekDiabetes & Endocrine Care, St Peter's Health Partners, Rensselaer, New York.
Raheela A KhawajaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus.
Priya KundraDepartment of Medicine, Endocrinology Section, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Kwok Seng LohDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Carrie B MarshallDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Sarah MaysonDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Kelly L McCoyDivision of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania.
Min En NgaDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Kee Yuan NgiamDepartment of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Marina N NikiforovaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer L PoehlsDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Matthew D RingelDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus.
Huaitao YangDepartment Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Linwah YipDivision of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania.
Yuri E NikiforovDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHRISTOPHER J. BAKKENIST · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
The Ohio State University and MD Anderson Cancer Center Thyroid Cancer SPOREP50CA168505 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DE LA CHAPELLE, ALBERT · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097190NCI NIH HHS P50 CA168505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 20% of fine-needle aspirations (FNA) of thyroid nodules have indeterminate cytology, most frequently Bethesda category III or IV. Diagnostic surgeries can be avoided for these patients if the nodules are reliably diagnosed as benign without surgery. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a multigene classifier (GC) test (ThyroSeq v3) for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, blinded cohort study conducted at 10 medical centers, with 782 patients with 1013 nodules enrolled. Eligibility criteria were met in 256 patients with 286 nodules; central pathology review was performed on 274 nodules. Interventions: A total of 286 FNA samples from thyroid nodules underwent molecular analysis using the multigene GC (ThyroSeq v3). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of the test for thyroid nodules with Bethesda III and IV cytology. The secondary outcome was prediction of cancer by specific genetic alterations in Bethesda III to V nodules. Results: Of the 286 cytologically indeterminate nodules, 206 (72%) were benign, 69 (24%) malignant, and 11 (4%) noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclei (NIFTP). A total of 257 (90%) nodules (154 Bethesda III, 93 Bethesda IV, and 10 Bethesda V) had informative GC analysis, with 61% classified as negative and 39% as positive. In Bethesda III and IV nodules combined, the test demonstrated a 94% (95% CI, 86%-98%) sensitivity and 82% (95% CI, 75%-87%) specificity. With a cancer/NIFTP prevalence of 28%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 97% (95% CI, 93%-99%) and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 66% (95% CI, 56%-75%). The observed 3% false-negative rate was similar to that of benign cytology, and the missed cancers were all low-risk tumors. Among nodules testing positive, specific groups of genetic alterations had cancer probabilities varying from 59% to 100%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective, blinded, multicenter study, the multigene GC test demonstrated a high sensitivity/NPV and reasonably high specificity/PPV, which may obviate diagnostic surgery in up to 61% of patients with Bethesda III to IV indeterminate nodules, and up to 82% of all benign nodules with indeterminate cytology. Information on specific genetic alterations obtained from FNA may help inform individualized treatment of patients with a positive test result.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSingaporeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30419129
PMCPMC6439562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.