SynthesisPloS one2018
A systematic review on the impact of gestational Lyme disease in humans on the fetus and newborn.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-genetic risk factors of miscarriage: a comprehensive umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Human granulocytotropic anaplasmosis-A systematic review and analysis of the literature.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Promoting a Positive Relationship Between Physicians and Patients with Lyme Disease During Pregnancy and Parenthood.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lyme borreliosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Advanced Molecular and Microscopic Diagnostics Suggest CongenitalMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Perinatal transmission ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Examining Infant and Child Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Lyme Disease During Pregnancy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Tick-Borne Diseases and Pregnancy: A Narrative Review Evaluating Pregnancy Complications Caused by Tick-Borne Diseases.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- What tools are available to assess climate and environmental health impacts on perinatal families with an equity lens? A rapid review of the Canadian context.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Review
- An Unusual Case of Serologically Confirmed Post-Partum Lyme Disease Following an AsymptomaticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Current and emerging approaches for eliminatingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Developing a Prospective Gestational Lyme Disease Study.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Case Report: Lyme Borreliosis and Pregnancy - Our Experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Lyme borreliosis in pregnancy and associations with parent and offspring health outcomes: An international cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Monitoring Risk: Tick andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and the Consequences of Anchoring Bias.Emerging infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Less common bacterial, fungal and viral infections: review of management in the pregnant patient.Drugs in context · 2021Review
- Lyme Disease Patient Outcomes and Experiences; A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Course and Outcome of Erythema Migrans in Pregnant Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lyme disease (LD), caused by bacteria of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species complex, is the most common vector-borne disease in North America and Europe. A systematic review (SR) was conducted to summarize the global literature on adverse birth outcomes associated with gestational LD in humans. The SR followed an a priori protocol of pretested screening, risk of bias, and data extraction forms. Data were summarized descriptively and random effects meta-analysis (MA) was used where appropriate. The SR identified 45 relevant studies, 29 describing 59 cases reported as gestational LD in the United States, Europe, and Asia (1969-2017). Adverse birth outcomes included spontaneous miscarriage or fetal death (n = 12), newborn death (n = 8), and newborns with an abnormal outcome (e.g. hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress and syndactyly) at birth (n = 16). Only one report provided a full case description (clinical manifestations in the mother, negative outcome for the child, and laboratory detection of B. burgdorferi in the child) that provides some evidence for vertical transmission of B. burgdorferi that has negative consequences for the fetus. The results of 17 epidemiological studies are included in this SR. Prevalence of adverse birth outcomes in an exposed population (defined by the authors as: gestational LD, history of LD, tick bites or residence in an endemic area) was compared to that in an unexposed population in eight studies and no difference was reported. A meta-analysis of nine studies showed significantly fewer adverse birth outcomes in women reported to have been treated for gestational LD (11%, 95%CI 7-16) compared to those who were not treated during pregnancy (50%, 95%CI 30-70) providing indirect evidence of an association between gestational LD and adverse birth outcomes. Other risk factors investigated; trimester of exposure, length of LD during pregnancy, acute vs. disseminated LD at diagnosis, and symptomatic LD vs. seropositive women with no LD symptoms during pregnancy were not significantly associated with adverse birth outcomes. This SR summarizes evidence from case studies that provide some limited evidence for transplacental transmission of B. burgdorferi. There was inconsistent evidence for adverse birth outcomes of gestational LD in the epidemiological research, and uncommon adverse outcomes for the fetus may occur as a consequence of gestational LD. The global evidence does not fully characterize the potential impact of gestational LD, and future research that addresses the knowledge gaps may change the findings in this SR. Given the current evidence; prompt diagnosis and treatment of LD during pregnancy is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.