Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30419047›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Fecal bacterial microbiota of Canadian commercial mink (Neovison vison): Yearly, life stage, and seasonal comparisons.

Nicole R Compo, Diego E Gomez, Brian Tapscott, J Scott Weese, Patricia V Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Dietary Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Characterizing the Gut Microbiota of Eurasian Otter (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Egyptian Mongoose (Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole R CompoDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Diego E GomezDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Brian TapscottOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Elora, Ontario, Canada.
J Scott WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia V TurnerDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1547-0139
University of Guelph · CAMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal microbiome is known to play a critical role in animal health but has been relatively poorly characterized in commercial mink, an obligate carnivore. Whether the microbiota can be manipulated in mink to improve pelt quality, health, and well-being is unknown. The objectives of this study were to characterize the fecal microbiota of commercial mink, and to evaluate potential changes due to year (2014 vs 2015), life stage (adult female vs weaned kit), season (summer vs winter), and between Canadian farms. Pooled fecal samples were collected from adult females and weaned kits in the summers of 2014 (n = 173) and 2015 (n = 168), and from females in the winter of 2016 (n = 39), a time when females undergo marked calorie restriction, from 49 mink farms in Ontario. Bacterial DNA was extracted and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified. Approximately 22 million sequences were identified following quality control filtering. A total of 31 bacterial phyla were identified; however, only 3 comprised >1% of the total sequences identified, with Firmicutes and Proteobacteria together comprising 95% of the total sequences. Comparisons were made by life stage, season and year; no differences were found in the relative abundance of any taxa between samples collected from adult females and weaned kits from the same year and the greatest number of differences at each taxonomic level were noted between 2014 and 2015. Significantly more operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were found in 2014 than 2015 or 2016 (p<0.05) and samples from 2014 were more even, but less diverse than in 2015 (p = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). There were significant differences in community population and structure by year and season (all p-values <0.001). The predominant phyla and genera at the farm level were similar from year to year. Together, these indicate that mink environment, season, and time are important factors in the stability of gastrointestinal microbiota, once mink reach maturity.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgingAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBiodiversityDNA, BacterialFecesFemaleMinkOntarioRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeasonsTime FactorsDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30419047
PMCPMC6231641
OpenAlexW2901281710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.