ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018
Development of 3D patient-based super-resolution digital breast phantoms using machine learning.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- 4D Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast CT: Phantom-based reconstruction parameter optimization for iodine quantification.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Towards 4D dedicated breast CT perfusion imaging of cancer: development and validation of computer simulated images.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Digital phantoms are important tools for optimization and evaluation of x-ray imaging systems, and should ideally reflect the 3D structure of human anatomy and its potential variability. In addition, they need to include a good level of detail at a high enough spatial resolution to accurately model the continuous nature of the human anatomy. A pipeline to increase the spatial resolution of patient-based digital breast phantoms that can be used for computer simulations of breast imaging is proposed. Given a tomographic breast image of finite resolution, the proposed methods can generate a phantom and increase its resolution at will, not only simply through super-sampling, but also by generating additional random glandular details to account for glandular edges and strands to compensate for those that may have not been detected in the original image due to the limited spatial resolution of the imaging system used. The proposed algorithms use supervised learning to predict the loss in glandularity due to limited resolution, and then to realistically recover this loss by learning the mapping between low and high resolution images. They were trained on high-resolution synchrotron images (detector pixel size 60 μm) reconstructed at seven voxel dimensions (60 μm-480 μm), and applied to patient images acquired with a clinical breast CT system (detector pixel size 194 μm) to generate super-resolution phantoms (voxel sizes 68 μm). Several evaluations were made to assess the appropriateness of the developed methods, both with the synchrotron (relative prediction error 0.010 ± 0.004, recovering accuracy 0.95 ± 0.04), and with the clinical images (average glandularity error at 194 μm: 0.15% ± 0.12%). Finally, a breast radiologist assessed the realism of the developed phantoms by blindly comparing original and phantom images, resulting in not being able to distinguish the real from the phantom images. In conclusion, the proposed method can generate super-resolution phantoms from tomographic breast patient images that can be used for future computer simulations for optimization of new breast imaging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.