ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018
Coalescence of residual histotripsy cavitation nuclei using low-gain regions of the therapy beam during electronic focal steering.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of High Pulse Repetition Frequency Single-Cycle Histotripsy for Rapid Tissue Ablation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Impact of low-amplitude pulse interspersed with histotripsy treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surgical mesh.Ultrasonics · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing cardiovascular care: the power of histotripsy.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Review
- Research progress and clinical evaluation of histotripsy: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Ultrasonic cavitation in COUltrasonics sonochemistry · 2021Article
- Endocavity Histotripsy for Efficient Tissue Ablation-Transducer Design and Characterization.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following collapse of a histotripsy cloud, residual microbubbles may persist for seconds, distributed throughout the focus. Their presence can attenuate and scatter subsequent pulses, hindering treatment speed and homogeneity. Previous studies have demonstrated use of separate low-amplitude (~1 MPa) pulses interleaved with histotripsy pulses to drive bubble coalescence (BC), significantly improving treatment speed without sacrificing homogeneity. We propose that by using electronic focal steering (EFS) to direct the therapy focus throughout specially-designed EFS sequences, it is possible to use low-gain regions of the therapy beam to accomplish BC during EFS without any additional acoustic sequence. First, to establish proof of principle for an isolated focus, a 50-foci EFS sequence was constructed with the first position isolated near the geometric focus and remaining positions distributed post-focally. EFS sequences were evaluated in tissue-mimicking phantoms with gas concentrations of 20% and 100% with respect to saturation. Results using an isolated focus demonstrated that at 20% gas concentration, 49 EFS pulses were sufficient to achieve BC in all samples for pulse repetition frequency (PRF) ⩽ 800 Hz and 84.1% ± 3.0% of samples at 5 kHz PRF. For phantoms prepared with 100% gas concentration, BC was achieved by 49 EFS pulses in 39.2% ± 4.7% of samples at 50 Hz PRF and 63.4% ± 15.3% of samples at 5 kHz. To show feasibility of using the EFS-BC method to ablate a large volume quickly, a 1000-foci EFS sequence covering a volume of approximately 27 ml was tested. Results indicate that the BC effect was similarly present. A treatment rate of 27 ± 6 ml min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.