ArticleEar and hearing
Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Childhood Unilateral Hearing Loss (CUHL Trial).The Laryngoscope · 2022Trial
- Central auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia: Effects of auditory-based cognitive training.Schizophrenia research · 2021Trial
- Clinical characteristics of asymmetric hearing loss in children from a large pediatric cohort.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Rehabilitation Strategies for Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness, Including Children with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Cochlear Implant Use in Pediatric Patients With Unilateral Hearing Loss.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Executive Functioning in Single-Sided Deafness: A Pediatric Comparison with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Evaluation of Listening Effort and Speech Perception in Noise in CROS and BiCROS Hearing Aid Users With Single-Sided Deafness.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Hearing Outcomes in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss. The Benefits of Rehabilitative Strategies: Preliminary Results.Audiology research · 2025Article
- A fast measure of spatial separation for release from masking and its relation to intelligibility.JASA express letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Cochlear implantation for children with single-sided deafness: parents' perspectives.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
- A Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Auditory Attention in Multi-Talker Environments.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- [Assessment of auditory perception of children with single-sided deafness after cochlear implantation].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024Article
- Speech, language, functional communication, psychosocial outcomes and QOL in school-age children with congenital unilateral hearing loss.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Children with non-central nervous system tumors treated with platinum-based chemotherapy are at risk for hearing loss and cognitive impairments.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Subjective Fatigue in Children With Unaided and Aided Unilateral Hearing Loss.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Characterisation of the treatment provided for children with unilateral hearing loss.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Impact of room acoustics and visual cues on speech perception and talker localization by children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The effect of noise on the cortical activity patterns of speech processing in adults with single-sided deafness.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- EEG alpha and pupil diameter reflect endogenous auditory attention switching and listening effort.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives(1) Measure sentence recognition in co-located and spatially separated target and masker configurations in school-aged children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and with normal hearing (NH). (2) Compare self-reported hearing-related quality-of-life (QoL) scores in school-aged children with UHL and NH.
designListeners were school-aged children (6 to 12 yrs) with permanent UHL (n = 41) or NH (n = 35) and adults with NH (n = 23). Sentence reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using Hearing In Noise Test-Children sentences in quiet and in the presence of 2-talker child babble or a speech-shaped noise masker in target/masker spatial configurations: 0/0, 0/-60, 0/+60, or 0/±60 degrees azimuth. Maskers were presented at a fixed level of 55 dBA, while the level of the target sentences varied adaptively to estimate the SRT. Hearing-related QoL was measured using the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL-26) questionnaire for child subjects.
resultsAs a group, subjects with unaided UHL had higher (poorer) SRTs than age-matched peers with NH in all listening conditions. Effects of age, masker type, and spatial configuration of target and masker signals were found. Spatial release from masking was significantly reduced in conditions where the masker was directed toward UHL subjects' normal-hearing ear. Hearing-related QoL scores were significantly poorer in subjects with UHL compared to those with NH. Degree of UHL, as measured by four-frequency pure-tone average, was significantly correlated with SRTs only in the two conditions where the masker was directed towards subjects' normal-hearing ear, although the unaided Speech Intelligibility Index at 65 dB SPL was significantly correlated with SRTs in four conditions, some of which directed the masker to the impaired ear or both ears. Neither pure-tone average nor unaided Speech Intelligibility Index was correlated with QoL scores.
conclusionsAs a group, school-aged children with UHL showed substantial reductions in masked speech perception and hearing-related QoL, irrespective of sex, laterality of hearing loss, and degree of hearing loss. While some children demonstrated normal or near-normal performance in certain listening conditions, a disproportionate number of thresholds fell in the poorest decile of the NH data. These findings add to the growing literature challenging the past assumption that one ear is "good enough."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.