Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30418262›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2019

Prediction of Lumbar Disk Herniation and Clinical Outcome Using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Marcus Raudner, Markus M Schreiner, Vladimir Juras, Michael Weber, David Stelzeneder, Claudia Kronnerwetter, Reinhard Windhager, Siegfried Trattnig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus RaudnerFrom the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
Markus M SchreinerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vladimir JurasFrom the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
Michael WeberFrom the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
David StelzenederDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia KronnerwetterHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, and.
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Siegfried TrattnigHigh-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, and.
Medical University of Vienna · ATInstitute of Measurement Science of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of T2 mapping at baseline with regard to the development of disk herniation and clinical outcome at a 5-year follow-up in patients with low back pain. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-five symptomatic patients (13 male; mean age, 44.0 years; range, 24-64 years at baseline) were examined at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging, with a 5-year follow-up. Region of interest analysis was performed on 125 lumbar intervertebral disks on 2 central sagittal T2 maps. Absolute T2 relaxation times and a T2 value ratio of the posterior annulus fibrosus as a percentage of the nucleus pulposus (NPAF) were evaluated for each disk. All disks were graded morphologically using the Pfirrmann score. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires (RMDQ) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed for each patient at follow-up as a clinical end point and compared with diagnosed lumbar disk herniation. Statistical analysis was conducted by a biomedical statistician.

resultsUsing the baseline NPAF ratio, follow-up development of herniation was predicted with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 in a receiver operating characteristic curve. The same was done using the baseline nucleus pulposus T2, resulting in an AUC of 0.901. Baseline and follow-up NPAF, as well as baseline and follow-up nucleus pulposus T2, differed significantly (P < 0.001) between disks with no herniation, disks with herniation at baseline, and disks with new herniation at follow-up. Difference was still significant (all P < 0.001), when only testing for difference in degenerated discs with Pfirrmann score III to V. Calculating sensitivity and specificity for herniation prediction only in discs with Pfirmann III to V using a receiver operating characteristic, AUC was 0.844 with baseline herniations excluded.The lowest baseline nucleus pulposus T2 per patient correlated significantly with follow-up RMDQ (r = -0.517; P = 0.008) and VAS (r = -0.494; P = 0.012). The highest baseline NPAF correlated significantly with RMDQ (r = 0.462; P = 0.020), but not VAS (r = 0.279; P = 0.177).

conclusionsQuantitative T2 mapping may serve as a clinically feasible, noninvasive imaging biomarker that can indicate disks at risk for herniation and correlates with clinical outcome and subjective patient burden in a representative cohort of patients with low back pain.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30418262
PMCPMC6396874
OpenAlexW2899930165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.