Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417935›Full record

ArticleProteins2019

iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations.

Cunliang Geng, Anna Vangone, Gert E Folkers, Li C Xue, Alexandre M J J Bonvin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cunliang GengBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-8358
Anna VangoneBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2485-7378
Gert E FolkersBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Li C XueBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-538X
Alexandre M J J BonvinBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science - Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-1322
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

Marie Curie BAP-659025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of binding affinity changes upon mutations is crucial for protein engineering and drug design. Machine learning-based methods are gaining increasing momentum in this field. Due to the limited number of experimental data, using a small number of sensitive predictive features is vital to the generalization and robustness of such machine learning methods. Here we introduce a fast and reliable predictor of binding affinity changes upon single point mutation, based on a random forest approach. Our method, iSEE, uses a limited number of interface Structure, Evolution, and Energy-based features for the prediction. iSEE achieves, using only 31 features, a high prediction performance with a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.80 and a root mean square error of 1.41 kcal/mol on a diverse training dataset consisting of 1102 mutations in 57 protein-protein complexes. It competes with existing state-of-the-art methods on two blind test datasets. Predictions for a new dataset of 487 mutations in 56 protein complexes from the recently published SKEMPI 2.0 database reveals that none of the current methods perform well (PCC < 0.42), although their combination does improve the predictions. Feature analysis for iSEE underlines the significance of evolutionary conservations for quantitative prediction of mutation effects. As an application example, we perform a full mutation scanning of the interface residues in the MDM2-p53 complex.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMutationBinding, CompetitiveComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein DomainsProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2ThermodynamicsTumor Suppressor Protein p53ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53binding affinityfull mutation scanningmachine learningprotein-protein interactionssingle point mutation

Identifiers

PMID30417935
PMCPMC6587874
OpenAlexW2949787032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.