Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417924›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2019

Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Sidney Grosprêtre, Florent Lebon, Charalambos Papaxanthis, Alain Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sidney GrosprêtreEA4660-C3S Laboratory - Culture, Sport, Health and Society, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-5842
Florent LebonCAPS, U1093 INSERM, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Facultés des Sciences du Sport, F-21078, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-9762
Charalambos PapaxanthisCAPS, U1093 INSERM, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Facultés des Sciences du Sport, F-21078, Dijon, France.
Alain MartinCAPS, U1093 INSERM, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Facultés des Sciences du Sport, F-21078, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsWhile a consensus has now been reached on the effect of motor imagery (MI) - the mental simulation of an action - on motor cortical areas, less is known about its impact on spinal structures. The current study, using H-reflex conditioning paradigms, examined the effect of a 20 min MI practice on several spinal mechanisms of the plantar flexor muscles. We observed modulations of spinal presynaptic circuitry while imagining, which was even more pronounced following an acute session of MI practice. We suggested that the small cortical output generated during MI may reach specific spinal circuits and that repeating MI may increase the sensitivity of the spinal cord to its effects. The short-term plasticity induced by MI practice may include spinal network modulation in addition to cortical reorganization. ABSTRACT: Kinesthetic motor imagery (MI) is the mental simulation of a movement with its sensory consequences but without its concomitant execution. While the effect of MI practice on cortical areas is well known, its influence on spinal circuitry remains unclear. Here, we assessed plastic changes in spinal structures following an acute MI practice. Thirteen young healthy participants accomplished two experimental sessions: a 20 min MI training consisting of four blocks of 25 imagined maximal isometric plantar flexions, and a 20 min rest (control session). The level of spinal presynaptic inhibition was assessed by conditioning the triceps surae spinal H-reflex with two methods: (i) the stimulation of the common peroneal nerve that induced D1 presynaptic inhibition (H

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationFemaleFemoral NerveH-ReflexHumansMaleMotor CortexMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeural InhibitionNeuronal PlasticityNeurons, AfferentPeroneal NerveSpinal CordD1 presynaptic inhibitionheteronymous Ia facilitationH-reflexsoleustriceps surae

Identifiers

PMID30417924
PMCPMC6355716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.