Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417826›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

TrpV1 receptor activation rescues neuronal function and network gamma oscillations from Aβ-induced impairment in mouse hippocampus in vitro.

Hugo Balleza-Tapia, Sophie Crux, Yuniesky Andrade-Talavera, Pablo Dolz-Gaiton, Daniela Papadia, Gefei Chen, Jan Johansson, André Fisahn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Capsaicin on Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. TRP Channels in Stroke.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo Balleza-TapiaNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3045-4594
Sophie CruxNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yuniesky Andrade-TalaveraNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pablo Dolz-GaitonNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniela PapadiaNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gefei ChenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan JohanssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
André FisahnNeuronal Oscillations Laboratory, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Alzheimer Research, Neurogeriatrics Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-175X
Karolinska Institutet · SEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) forms plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is responsible for early cognitive deficits in AD patients. Advancing cognitive decline is accompanied by progressive impairment of cognition-relevant EEG patterns such as gamma oscillations. The endocannabinoid anandamide, a TrpV1-receptor agonist, reverses hippocampal damage and memory impairment in rodents and protects neurons from Aβ-induced cytotoxic effects. Here, we investigate a restorative role of TrpV1-receptor activation against Aβ-induced degradation of hippocampal neuron function and gamma oscillations. We found that the TrpV1-receptor agonist capsaicin rescues Aβ-induced degradation of hippocampal gamma oscillations by reversing both the desynchronization of AP firing in CA3 pyramidal cells and the shift in excitatory/inhibitory current balance. This rescue effect is TrpV1-receptor-dependent since it was absent in TrpV1 knockout mice or in the presence of the TrpV1-receptor antagonist capsazepine. Our findings provide novel insight into the network mechanisms underlying cognitive decline in AD and suggest TrpV1 activation as a novel therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsCA3 Region, HippocampalCapsaicinCognitionElectrodes, ImplantedGamma RhythmGene ExpressionHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMicrotomyAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)CapsaicincapsazepinePeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsTRPV1 protein, mouseTRPV Cation ChannelsAlzheimer Diseaseamyloid-betagamma oscillationshippocampusmouseneuronal networkneuroscienceTrpV1 receptor

Identifiers

PMID30417826
PMCPMC6281315
OpenAlexW2901693213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.