Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417281›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Extended laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience.

Mushegh A Sahakyan, Dyre Kleive, Airazat M Kazaryan, Davit L Aghayan, Dejan Ignjatovic, Knut Jørgen Labori, Bård Ingvald Røsok, Bjørn Edwin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mushegh A SahakyanDepartment of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia. sahakyan.mushegh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-7694
Dyre KleiveInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Airazat M KazaryanDepartment of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Davit L AghayanThe Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
Dejan IgnjatovicInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Knut Jørgen LaboriDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Bård Ingvald RøsokDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn EdwinThe Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtended resection is required for pancreatic adenocarcinoma infiltrating adjacent organs and structures. The role of laparoscopy in this setting is unclear. In this study, the outcomes of extended laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (ELDP) for pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma were examined.

methodsPerioperative and oncologic data were analyzed in patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for adenocarcinoma at Oslo University Hospital. ELDP was defined as suggested by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. The outcomes of ELDP were compared to those following standard LDP (SLDP).

resultsFrom August 2001 to June 2016, 460 consecutive patients underwent LDP for pancreatic neoplasms including 116 (25%) adenocarcinoma. SLDP and ELDP were applied in 78 and 31 patients, respectively. The adrenal gland (33%) and colon (21%) were the most frequently resected organs during ELDP. The latter was associated with larger tumor size (5.5 vs 4 cm, p = 0.03), longer operative time (236 vs 158 min, p = 0.001) and higher conversion rate (16 vs 3%, p = 0.019) compared with SLDP. Morbidity and 90-day mortality were similar. Median follow-up was 18 months. In patients with ductal adenocarcinoma, ELDP (n = 22) was associated with significantly shorter recurrence-free and overall survival than SLDP (n = 59) (6.2 vs 9.6 months, p = 0.047 and 12.9 vs 27 months, p < 0.01, respectively).

conclusionAlthough technically challenging, ELDP is feasible in patients with adenocarcinoma providing acceptable surgical outcomes. ELDP for ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with worse prognosis than SLDP, while its potential benefits over palliative care deserve further scrutiny.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatectomyAdenocarcinomaAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePancreatic NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAdenocarcinomaExtendedLaparoscopyPancreatectomySurvival

Identifiers

PMID30417281
OpenAlexW2900031977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.