ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019
Applying machine learning to continuously monitored physiological data.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of machine learning models for management, prediction and classification of ARDS.Respiratory research · 2024Pooled it
- Closed-loop oxygen control for critically ill patients--A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning for the development of diagnostic models of decompensated heart failure or exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Physiological Data Integration and Predictive Modeling in Intensive Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- FetalMLOps: operationalizing machine learning models for standard fetal ultrasound plane classification.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- In limbo: Physiological monitoring of emergency department boarders.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning for predicting medical outcomes associated with acute lithium poisoning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of machine learning for heart disease prediction: challenges, trends, ethical considerations, and future directions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Machine Learning for Predicting Intubations in Heart Failure Patients: the Challenge of the Right Approach.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Article
- Ringing a bell in healthcare: harnessing benefits, overcoming implementation challenges, and bridging knowledge gaps of Closed-Loop Oxygen Control systems (CLOCs).Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Optimizing artificial intelligence in sepsis management: Opportunities in the present and looking closely to the future.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Review
- Closed-loop oxygen control for patients with hypoxaemia during hospitalisation: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight): clinical performance in Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
- A Healthcare Paradigm for Deriving Knowledge Using Online Consumers' Feedback.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted acute patient journey.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Remote Health Monitoring in Clinical Trial using Machine Learning Techniques: A Conceptual Framework.Health and technology · 2022Review
- Early prediction of hypothermia in pediatric intensive care units using machine learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Machine learning for atrial fibrillation risk prediction in patients with sleep apnea and coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases-A narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of machine learning (ML) in healthcare has enormous potential for improving disease detection, clinical decision support, and workflow efficiencies. In this commentary, we review published and potential applications for the use of ML for monitoring within the hospital environment. We present use cases as well as several questions regarding the application of ML to the analysis of the vast amount of complex data that clinicians must interpret in the realm of continuous physiological monitoring. ML, especially employed in bidirectional conjunction with electronic health record data, has the potential to extract much more useful information out of this currently under-analyzed data source from a population level. As a data driven entity, ML is dependent on copious, high quality input data so that error can be introduced by low quality data sources. At present, while ML is being studied in hybrid formulations along with static expert systems for monitoring applications, it is not yet actively incorporated in the formal artificial learning sense of an algorithm constantly learning and updating its rules without external intervention. Finally, innovations in monitoring, including those supported by ML, will pose regulatory and medico-legal challenges, as well as questions regarding precisely how to incorporate these features into clinical care and medical education. Rigorous evaluation of ML techniques compared to traditional methods or other AI methods will be required to validate the algorithms developed with consideration of database limitations and potential learning errors. Demonstration of value on processes and outcomes will be necessary to support the use of ML as a feature in monitoring system development: Future research is needed to evaluate all AI based programs before clinical implementation in non-research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.