Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417248›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2019

Unusual 18S rDNA of Acanthamoeba containing intron turned out to be a T5/T4 chimera.

Daniele Corsaro, Danielle Venditti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniele CorsaroCHLAREAS, 12, rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. corsaro@gmx.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1754-1546
Danielle VendittiCHLAREAS, 12, rue du Maconnais, F-54500, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The free-living amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba are widely investigated for their diversity and evolution. Studies usually employ biomolecular methods targeting the 18S rRNA gene, assigning strains according to a well-established genotyping system. Strains from at least four genotypes contain introns in their rDNA. By retracing the evolutionary history of these introns within the amoebae, we found that the 18S rDNA of TUMSJ-341 strain (ATCC PRA-11), assigned to the genotype T5 (A. lenticulata), proved very unusual in our analyses, not corresponding to the characteristics of the group. The sequence contains a group I intron recovered only in A. lenticulata. At BLAST, however, the intron-less 18S rDNA of TUMSJ-341 does not match with T5 strains but shows some affinity with strains from genotype T4, suggesting a new genotype. Our accurate analysis of this sequence finally revealed a mixture of variable regions, showing that such discordant results are due to the insertion into the gene of a strain T5 of a DNA fragment containing hypervariable regions specific for a T4 strain. Data presented herein indicate that this sequence is probably a chimera.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalIntronsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SGenotypeHumansPhylogenyDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18S18S rDNA genotypesAcanthamoeba lenticulataAcanthamoeba T4Acanthamoeba T5Chimeric sequencesVariable regions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.