Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417226›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

Micro-CT comparison of XP-endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris from oval shaped-canals.

Gustavo De-Deus, Felipe Gonçalves Belladonna, Arthur de Siqueira Zuolo, Renata Perez, Marco Simões Carvalho, Erick Miranda Souza, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. XP-endo Finisher effectively reduces hard-tissue debris accumulated in root canals with isthmus after preparation with a reciprocating file system.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo De-DeusDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Henrique Dodsworth 85 Apto 808 - Lagoa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22061-030, Brazil. endogus@gmail.com.
Felipe Gonçalves BelladonnaDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Henrique Dodsworth 85 Apto 808 - Lagoa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22061-030, Brazil.
Arthur de Siqueira ZuoloDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Henrique Dodsworth 85 Apto 808 - Lagoa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22061-030, Brazil.
Renata PerezDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Henrique Dodsworth 85 Apto 808 - Lagoa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22061-030, Brazil.
Marco Simões CarvalhoDepartment of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University, Av. Henrique Dodsworth 85 Apto 808 - Lagoa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22061-030, Brazil.
Erick Miranda SouzaDepartment of Dentistry II, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Ricardo Tadeu LopesNuclear Engineering Program, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal SilvaDepartment of Endodontics, Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Federal do Maranhão · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Unigranrio · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of the XP-endo Finisher instrument and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) as final irrigation protocols on the removal of accumulated hard-tissue debris (AHTD) from oval-shaped canals using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) analysis.

methodsTwenty mandibular incisors were anatomically pair-matched based on similar morphological dimensions (length, volume, aspect ratio, and configuration) through micro-CT analysis, prepared with Reciproc R25 instrument, scanned again, and assigned to one of the two experimental groups (n = 10), according to the final irrigation protocol: XP-endo Finisher and PUI. After the final irrigation protocols, the specimens were rescanned and the registered datasets were examined to quantify the amount of AHTD. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's t test with a significance level of 5%.

resultsThe final irrigation protocols were highly similar in terms of volumetric percentage reduction of AHTD (P = 1.000).

conclusionsXP-endo Finisher and PUI showed the same effectiveness on the removal of AHTD. None of the tested final irrigation protocols completely removed the AHTD from oval-shaped root canals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AHTD may be considered clinically relevant because it could harbor bacterial contents away from the disinfection procedures. Both final irrigation protocols were effective on the removal of AHTD.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal PreparationUltrasonicsHumansIncisorRoot Canal IrrigantsTherapeutic IrrigationX-Ray MicrotomographyRoot Canal IrrigantsHard-tissue debrisMicro-CTOval-shaped canalsPassive ultrasonic irrigationXP-endo Finisher

Identifiers

PMID30417226
OpenAlexW2900299152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.