Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417158›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in systems biology2018

Remembering the past: Mitotic bookmarking in a developing embryo.

Maelle Bellec, Ovidiu Radulescu, Mounia Lagha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regulatory logic of neuronal differentiation in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maelle BellecInstitut de Genetique Moleculaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Ovidiu RadulescuDIMNP, UMR CNRS 5235, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Mounia LaghaInstitut de Genetique Moleculaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During development, transcriptional properties of progenitor cells are stably propagated across multiple cellular divisions. Yet, at each division, chromatin faces structural constraints imposed by the important nuclear re-organization operating during mitosis. It is now clear that not all transcriptional regulators are ejected during mitosis, but rather that a subset of transcription factors, chromatin regulators and epigenetic histone marks are able to 'bookmark' specific loci, thereby providing a mitotic memory. Here we review mechanisms of mitotic bookmarking and discuss their impact on transcriptional dynamics in the context of multicellular developing embryos. We document recent discoveries and technological advances, and present current mathematical models of short-term transcriptional memory.

Indexed as

DevelopmentEpigeneticsHistone modificationsMathematical modelingMemoryMitotic bookmarkingTranscriptionTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID30417158
PMCPMC6218673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.