Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417111›Full record

ArticlemSystems

High-Throughput Miniaturized 16S rRNA Amplicon Library Preparation Reduces Costs while Preserving Microbiome Integrity.

Jeremiah J Minich, Greg Humphrey, Rodolfo A S Benitez, Jon Sanders, Austin Swafford, Eric E Allen, Rob Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ReBiA-Robotic Enabled Biological Automation: 3D Epithelial Tissue Production.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremiah J MinichMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Greg HumphreyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rodolfo A S BenitezDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jon SandersDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Austin SwaffordCenter for Microbiome Innovation, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Eric E AllenMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rob KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled many advances across biology, with microbial ecology benefiting primarily through expanded sample sizes. Although the cost of running sequencing instruments has decreased substantially over time, the price of library preparation methods has largely remained unchanged. In this study, we developed a low-cost miniaturized (5-µl volume) high-throughput (384-sample) amplicon library preparation method with the Echo 550 acoustic liquid handler. Our method reduces costs of library preparation to $1.42 per sample, a 58% reduction compared to existing automated methods and a 21-fold reduction from commercial kits, without compromising sequencing success or distorting the microbial community composition analysis. We further validated the optimized method by sampling five body sites from 46 Pacific chub mackerel fish caught across 16 sampling events over seven months from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography pier in La Jolla, CA. Fish microbiome samples were processed with the miniaturized 5-µl reaction volume with 0.2 µl of genomic DNA (gDNA) and the standard 25-µl reaction volume with 1 µl of gDNA. Between the two methods, alpha diversity was highly correlated (

Indexed as

acoustic liquid handlerautomationDNA metabarcodingIllumina MiSeqlibrary preparationmetabarcodingmicrobial ecologymicrobiomeNGS

Identifiers

PMID30417111
PMCPMC6222042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.