Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417043›Full record

ArticleData in brief2018

Assessing the performance of Granger-Geweke causality: Benchmark dataset and simulation framework.

Mattia F Pagnotta, Mukesh Dhamala, Gijs Plomp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A single cortical circuit implements fast and slow visual search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mattia F PagnottaPerceptual Networks Group, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1701, Switzerland.
Mukesh DhamalaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Gijs PlompPerceptual Networks Group, Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1701, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonparametric methods based on spectral factorization offer well validated tools for estimating spectral measures of causality, called Granger-Geweke Causality (GGC). In Pagnotta et al. (2018) [1] we benchmarked nonparametric GGC methods using EEG data recorded during unilateral whisker stimulations in ten rats; here, we include detailed information about the benchmark dataset. In addition, we provide codes for estimating nonparametric GGC and a simulation framework to evaluate the effects on GGC analyses of potential problems, such as the common reference problem, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) differences between channels, and the presence of additive noise. We focus on nonparametric methods here, but these issues also affect parametric methods, which can be tested in our framework as well. Our examples allow showing that time reversal testing for GGC (tr-GGC) mitigates the detrimental effects due to SNR imbalance and presence of mixed additive noise, and illustrate that, when using a common reference, tr-GGC unambiguously detects the causal influence׳s dominant spectral component, irrespective of the characteristics of the common reference signal. Finally, one of our simulations provides an example that nonparametric methods can overcome a pitfall associated with the implementation of conditional GGC in traditional parametric methods.

Indexed as

Additive noiseBarrel cortexBrain connectivityCommon reference problemConditional Granger causalityEEGNonparametric Granger causalitySNR imbalance

Identifiers

PMID30417043
PMCPMC6216071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.