Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30417017›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Tumor Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network.

Qiaoliang Li, Yuzhen Xu, Zhewei Chen, Dexiang Liu, Shi-Ting Feng, Martin Law, Yufeng Ye, Bingsheng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qiaoliang LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2876-4152
Yuzhen XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-3928
Zhewei ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Dexiang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shi-Ting FengDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Martin LawDepartment of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Yufeng YeDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9843-475X
Bingsheng HuangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-7506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the application of a deep learning architecture, based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) technique, to perform automatic tumor segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective study, 87 MRI containing tumor regions were acquired from newly diagnosed NPC patients. These 87 MRI were augmented to >60,000 images. The proposed CNN network is composed of two phases: feature representation and scores map reconstruction. We designed a stepwise scheme to train our CNN network. To evaluate the performance of our method, we used case-by-case leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The ground truth of tumor contouring was acquired by the consensus of two experienced radiologists.

resultsThe mean values of dice similarity coefficient, percent match, and their corresponding ratio with our method were 0.89±0.05, 0.90±0.04, and 0.84±0.06, respectively, all of which were better than reported values in the similar studies.

conclusionsWe successfully established a segmentation method for NPC based on deep learning in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Further clinical trials with dedicated algorithms are warranted.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNeural Networks, ComputerProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30417017
PMCPMC6207874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.