ReviewHealth and technology2018
Digital technologies for social inclusion of individuals with disabilities.
Review in Health and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- eHealth in the support of people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020Pooled it
- Use of a low-tech tool in the improvement of social interaction of patients with Rett Syndrome: an observational study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- Practical Digital Competence and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Adults with Severe Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Indirect Associations Through Perceived Self-Determination in Daily Life.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with the Intention to Adopt Digital Health Technologies for Physical Activity Among People with Disabilities: An Integrated Technology Acceptance Model-Theory of Planned Behavior Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the participation of people with disabilities in digital skills training in Poland.PloS one · 2026Article
- Inclusive design in digital mental health: stakeholders with disabilities must be central to usability testing.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Inclusion through technology: findings from a public engagement approach.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Understanding social inclusion: A directed content analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- [Interface Communication and Information Transfer in Medical Care for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Qualitative Expert Interviews].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024Article
- ICT Framework for Supporting Applied Behavior Analysis in the Social Inclusion of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- PREparedness, REsponse and SySTemic transformation (PRE-RE-SyST): a model for disability-inclusive pandemic responses and systemic disparities reduction derived from a scoping review and thematic analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Weak Signal-Oriented Investigation of Ethical Dissonance Applied to Unsuccessful Mobility Experiences Linked to Human-Machine Interactions.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Innovation for Positive Sustainable Legacy From Mega Sports Events: Virtual Reality as a Tool for Social Inclusion Legacy for Paris 2024 Paralympic Games.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Review
- Addressing Inequalities Toward Inclusive Governance for Achieving One Health: A Rapid Review.Frontiers in public health · 2021Review
- System for Face Recognition under Different Facial Expressions Using a New Associative Hybrid Model Amαβ-KNN for People with Visual Impairment or Prosopagnosia.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information technology can be an important facilitator of social inclusion for people with disabilities into society. However, the goals specified in this area by organizations such as the European Commission have not yet been achieved in their totality. The aim of this paper is to explore which types of information communication technology-based applications and/or digital services have been suggested to facilitate the social integration of people who suffer from different types of disabilities. We performed a literature review that included studies published during a period of 6 years (2010-2016). The results show that, in the data we have had access to, no concrete patterns can be identified regarding the type of technology or technological trends that can be used to support the social integration of individuals with disabilities. This literature review is of relevance to the identification of further research areas and to the identification of issues which have to be considered in the context of the development and implementation of technological innovations that are aimed at promoting or facilitating social inclusion of individuals with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.