ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2018
Mismatch repair-based stratification for immune checkpoint blockade therapy.
Review in American journal of cancer research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Status of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Enhanced clinical assessment of hematologic malignancies through routine paired tumor and normal sequencing.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Pathogenic Insights into DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) Genes-Proteins and Microsatellite Instability: Focus on Adrenocortical Carcinoma and Beyond.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Predictive biomarkers and new developments of immunotherapy in gastric cancer: a 2023 update.American journal of cancer research · 2023Review
- Mismatch repair-deficient hormone receptor-positive breast cancers: Biology and pathological characterization.Cancer cell international · 2021Review
- A greater lymph node yield is required during pathological examination in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Clinical Pan-Cancer Assessment of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Using Tumor-Only, Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing.JCO precision oncology · 2020Article
- Immunohistochemical evaluation of microsatellite instability in resected colorectal liver metastases: a preliminary experience.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2020Article
- Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Biomarkers for precision immunotherapy in the metastatic setting: hope or reality?Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Review
- Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Microsatellite instability and immune checkpoint inhibitors: toward precision medicine against gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers.Journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Identification of genomic features associated with immunotherapy response in gastrointestinal cancers.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR) plays a key role in maintaining genomic stability. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) causes a molecular feature of microsatellite instability (MSI) and contributes to the development of human cancers and genetic diseases with cancer predisposition such as Lynch syndrome. Recent studies have shown that immune checkpoint blockade therapy has a promising response in MMR-D cancers regardless of the tissue of origin. Being able to identify patients with MMR-D cancers is an important challenge in clinical practice. Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MSI analysis combined with a subsequent MMR gene test are used as the standard of care in the clinical setting to identify patients with MMR-D cancers, these methods have limitations as a pan-cancer testing strategy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has developed and matured as a clinical option and NGS has advantages for use as a novel testing strategy for MMR-D detection. In this review, we describe the genetic basis of MMR-D, current diagnostic algorithms in the clinical management of MMR-D, the novel NGS approach, and potential detection strategy of anti-cancer immunity biomarkers of MMR-D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30416850PMC6220134W2983200439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.