Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30416761›Full record

ArticleMRS advances2018

Design, Manufacture, and

Prajan Divakar, Isabella Caruso, Karen L Moodie, Regan N Theiler, P Jack Hoopes, Ulrike G K Wegst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MRS advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prajan DivakarThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
Isabella CarusoThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
Karen L MoodieGeisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 0375, U.S.A.
Regan N TheilerMayo Clinic Division of Obstetrics, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A.
P Jack HoopesThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
Ulrike G K WegstThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, U.S.A.
Dartmouth College · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Training in Surgical InnovationT32EB021966 · NIBIB · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Eric R Fossum, Sohail K Mirza · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
A Nanotherapeutic Device for Effective Non-Surgical Female SterilizationR21HD087828 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WEGST, ULRIKE GESA KATHARINA · 2016 to 2017
$435k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021966NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current FDA-approved permanent female sterilization procedures are invasive and/or require the implantation of non-biodegradable materials. These techniques pose risks and complications, such as device migration, fracture, and tubal perforation. We propose a safe, non-invasive biodegradable tissue scaffold to effectively occlude the Fallopian tubes within 30 days of implantation. Specifically, the Fallopian tubes are mechanically de-epithelialized, and a tissue scaffold is placed into each tube. It is anticipated that this procedure can be performed in less than 30 minutes by an experienced obstetrics and gynaecology practitioner. Advantages of this method include the use of a fully bio-resorbable polymer, low costs, lower risks, and the lack of general anaesthesia. The scaffold devices are freeze-cast allowing for the custom-design of structural, mechanical, and chemical cues through material composition, processing parameters, and functionalization. The performance of the biomaterial and de-epithelialization procedure was tested in an in vivo rat uterine horn model. The scaffold response and tissue-biomaterial interactions were characterized microscopically post-implantation. Overall, the study resulted in the successful fabrication of resilient, easy-to-handle devices with an anisotropic scaffold architecture that encouraged rapid bio-integration through notable angiogenesis, cell infiltration, and native collagen deposition. Successful tubal occlusion was demonstrated at 30 days, revealing the great promise of a sterilization biomaterial.

Identifiers

PMID30416761
PMCPMC6223265
OpenAlexW2782715730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.