Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30416753›Full record

ReviewNPJ Regenerative medicine2018

Parallels between vertebrate cardiac and cutaneous wound healing and regeneration.

Rebecca J Richardson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  3. Cuban Policosanol (RaydelPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New Approaches in Heart Research: Prevention Instead of Cardiomyoplasty?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wound Healing Insights from Flies and Fish.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Faster skin wound healing predicts survival after myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The novel zebrafish modelBiology open · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca J RichardsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-8713
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/2/31225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular events that contribute to tissue healing of non-sterile wounds to the skin and ischaemic injury to internal organs such as the heart share remarkable similarities despite the differences between these injury types and organs. In adult vertebrates, both injuries are characterised by a complex series of overlapping events involving multiple different cell types and cellular interactions. In adult mammals both tissue-healing processes ultimately lead to the permanent formation of a fibrotic, collagenous scar, which can have varying effects on tissue function depending on the site and magnitude of damage. Extensive scarring in the heart as a result of a severe myocardial infarction contributes to ventricular dysfunction and the progression of heart failure. Some vertebrates such as adult zebrafish, however, retain a more embryonic capacity for scar-free tissue regeneration in many tissues including the skin and heart. In this review, the similarities and differences between these different types of wound healing are discussed, with special attention on recent advances in regenerative, non-scarring vertebrate models such as the zebrafish.

Identifiers

PMID30416753
PMCPMC6220283
OpenAlexW2898998863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.