Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30416643›Full record

ArticleElectronic journal of statistics2018

High-Dimensional Inference for Personalized Treatment Decision.

X Jessie Jeng, Wenbin Lu, Huimin Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electronic journal of statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Variable selection for individualised treatment rules with discrete outcomes.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A single-index model with multiple-links.Journal of statistical planning and inference · 2020
    Article
  13. Precision Medicine.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

X Jessie JengDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, SAS Hall, 2311 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27695-8203.
Wenbin LuDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, SAS Hall, 2311 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27695-8203.
Huimin PengDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, SAS Hall, 2311 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27695-8203.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent development in statistical methodology for personalized treatment decision has utilized high-dimensional regression to take into account a large number of patients' covariates and described personalized treatment decision through interactions between treatment and covariates. While a subset of interaction terms can be obtained by existing variable selection methods to indicate relevant covariates for making treatment decision, there often lacks statistical interpretation of the results. This paper proposes an asymptotically unbiased estimator based on Lasso solution for the interaction coefficients. We derive the limiting distribution of the estimator when baseline function of the regression model is unknown and possibly misspecified. Confidence intervals and p-values are derived to infer the effects of the patients' covariates in making treatment decision. We confirm the accuracy of the proposed method and its robustness against misspecified function in simulation and apply the method to STAR*D study for major depression disorder.

Indexed as

Large p Small nModel MisspecificationOptimal Treatment RegimeRobust Regression

Identifiers

PMID30416643
PMCPMC6226259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.