ArticlePharmacy practice
Management of allergic rhinitis in the community pharmacy: identifying the reasons behind medication self-selection.
Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review for improper application of nasal spray in allergic rhinitis: A proposed role of community pharmacist for patient education and counseling in practical setting.Asia Pacific allergy · 2025Review
- Aerobiology matters: Why people in the community access pollen information and how they use it.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Article
- The future of allergic rhinitis management: A partnership between healthcare professionals and patients.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- The impact of implementing an allergic rhinitis clinical management pathway (AR-CMaP) in the community pharmacy.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Uncovering the Burden of Rhinitis in Patients Purchasing Nonprescription Short-Acting β-Agonist (SABA) in the Community.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Self-Management in Allergic Rhinitis: Strategies, Outcomes and Integration into Clinical Care.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Review
- Management of allergic rhinitis symptoms in the pharmacy Pocket guide 2022.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Knowledge and Attitude Among Patients and Physicians on Allergic Rhinitis (KAPPA): An International Survey.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
- Characterisation of the Australian Adult Population Living with Asthma: Severe - Exacerbation Frequency, Long-Term OCS Use and Adverse Effects.Pragmatic and observational research · 2022Article
- Allergic rhinitis characterization in community pharmacy customers: a cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Closing the knowledge gap in Malaysian pharmacists: a virtual Allergic Rhinitis Boot Camp initiative.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of allergic rhinitis on the day-to-day lives of children: insights from an Australian cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Qualitative Exploration of Pharmacists' Feedback Following the Implementation of an "Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Management Pathway (AR-CMaP)" in Australian Community Pharmacies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Potential of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Monitoring of Allergic Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Evaluation of Community Pharmacists' Professional Practice and Management of Patient's Respiratory Conditions.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity pharmacists have a key role to play in the management of allergic rhinitis (AR). Their role is especially important because the majority of medications used to treat AR are available for purchase over-the-counter (OTC), allowing patients to self-select their own medications and bypass the pharmacists. Patients' self-selection often results in suboptimal treatment selection, undertreated AR and poor clinical outcomes. In order for pharmacists to optimise the care for AR patients in the pharmacy, pharmacists need to be able to identify patient cohorts who self-select and are at high risk of mismanagement.
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the demographics, clinical characteristics and medication selected, between pharmacy customers who choose to self-select and those who speak with a pharmacist when purchasing medication for their AR in a community pharmacy and identify factors associated with AR patients' medication(s) self-selection behaviour.
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a convenience sample of community pharmacies from the Sydney metropolitan area. Demographics, pattern of AR symptoms, their impact on quality of life (QOL) and medication(s) selected, were collected. Logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with participants' medication self-selection behaviour.
resultsOf the 296 recruited participants, 202 were identified with AR; 67.8% were female, 54.5% were >40 years of age, 64.9% had a doctor's diagnosis of AR, and 69.3% self-selected medication(s). Participants with AR who self-select were 4 times more likely to experience moderate-severe wheeze (OR 4.047, 95% CI 1.155-14.188) and almost 0.4 times less likely to experience an impact of AR symptoms on their QOL (OR 0.369, 95% CI 0.188-0.727).
conclusionsThe factors associated with AR patients' self-selecting medication(s) are the presence of wheeze and the absence of impact on their QOL due to AR symptoms. By identifying this cohort of patients, our study highlights an opportunity for pharmacists to engage these patients and encourage discussion about their AR and asthma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.