Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30416605›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2018

Systematic Development of a Dutch School-Based Sexual Prejudice Reduction Program: an Intervention Mapping Approach.

Fraukje E F Mevissen, Gerjo Kok, Anita Watzeels, Gee van Duin, Arjan E R Bos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fraukje E F Mevissen1Department of Applied Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Gerjo Kok1Department of Applied Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Postbox 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Anita WatzeelsRotterdam-Rijnmond Public Health Service, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gee van Duin3Department of Educational Science and Teacher Training College, University of Amsterdam, Postbox 19268, 1000 GG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arjan E R Bos4Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Postbox 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiences of sexual prejudice threaten the quality of life and psychological well-being of sexual minority youth. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of how we developed a theory- and evidence-based sexual prejudice reduction program suitable for the Dutch high school context, guided by the intervention mapping approach (IM). In line with IM, six steps were followed: an initial needs assessment in which empirical, theoretical, and new data were gathered to acquire a thorough understanding of the problem (step 1); the formulation of program objectives for both students and teachers (step 2); the selection of theory-based methods and applications (step 3); program development (step 4); the provision of an adoption and implementation plan (step 5); and the development of an evaluation plan (step 6). In conclusion, developing a sexual prejudice reduction program for schools is a challenging but feasible process. IM is an effective tool for the systematic (theory- and evidence-driven) development of such a program.

Indexed as

AdolescentsHomophobic bullyingIntervention mappingSchool-based interventionSexual prejudiceTheory and evidence based

Identifiers

PMID30416605
PMCPMC6208781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.