Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30416317›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2018

Risk of lymph node metastases in patients with T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective single centre experience.

David Graham, Nejc Sever, Cormac Magee, William Waddingham, Matthew Banks, Rami Sweis, Hannah Al-Yousuf, Miriam Mitchison, Durayd Alzoubaidi, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of early oesophageal cancer: An overview.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David GrahamGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Nejc SeverGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Cormac MageeGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
William WaddinghamGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Matthew BanksGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Rami SweisGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Hannah Al-YousufGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Miriam MitchisonGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Durayd AlzoubaidiGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Manuel Rodriguez-JustoGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Laurence LovatGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Marco NovelliGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Marnix JansenGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
Rehan HaidryGI Services, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
University College Hospital · GBLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess clinical outcomes for submucosal (T1b) oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) patients managed with either surgery or endoscopic eradication therapy.

methodsPatients found to have T1b OAC following endoscopic resection between January 2008 to February 2016 at University College London Hospital were retrospectively analysed. Patients were split into low-risk and high-risk groups according to established histopathological criteria and were then further categorised according to whether they underwent surgical resection or conservative management. Study outcomes include the presence of lymph-node metastases, disease-specific mortality and overall survival.

resultsA total of 60 patients were included; 22 patients were surgically managed (1 low-risk and 21 high-risk patients) whilst 38 patients were treated conservatively (12 low-risk and 26 high-risk). Overall, lymph node metastases (LNM) were detected in 10 patients (17%); six of these patients had undergone conservative management and LNM were detected at a median of 4 mo after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). All LNM occurred in patients with high-risk lesions and this represented 21% of the total high-risk lesions. Importantly, there was no statistically significant difference in tumor-related deaths between those treated surgically or conservatively (

conclusionT1b tumours without histopathological high-risk markers of LNM can be treated endoscopically with good out-comes. In selected patients, endoscopic therapy may be appropriate for high-risk lesions.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal MucosaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisEndoscopyLymph node metastasisOesophageal adenocarcinomaRisk predictionSubmucosal invasionT1b

Identifiers

PMID30416317
PMCPMC6224466
OpenAlexW2899875596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.