Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30415902›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2019

Outcomes after neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for cT2-4N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis.

Whitney S Brandt, Wanpu Yan, Jian Zhou, Kay See Tan, Joseph Montecalvo, Bernard J Park, Prasad S Adusumilli, James Huang, Matthew J Bott, Valerie W Rusch and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in Resectable NSCLC: Current and Future Perspectives.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Whitney S BrandtThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Wanpu YanThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jian ZhouThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Kay See TanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Joseph MontecalvoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Bernard J ParkThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Prasad S AdusumilliThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
James HuangThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Matthew J BottThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Valerie W RuschThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Daniela MolenaThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
William D TravisDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Mark G KrisThoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jamie E ChaftThoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
David R JonesThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: jonesd2@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
BRMS1-mediated suppression of metastases in p53 mutant lung adenocarcinomaR01CA217169 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JONES, DAVID R · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217169NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComparative survival between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer has not been extensively studied.

methodsPatients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer who received platinum-based chemotherapy were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included stage IV disease, induction radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, chemotherapy tolerance, and ability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors response to predict survival. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models, and stratified using matched pairs after propensity score matching.

resultsIn total, 330 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 92/group after propensity-score matching; median follow-up, 42 months). Five-year disease-free survival was 49% (95% confidence interval, 39-61) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus 48% (95% confidence interval, 38-61) for adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .70). On multivariable analysis, disease-free survival was not associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.90; P = .737), nor was overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.30; P = .572). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was more likely to receive full doses and cycles of chemotherapy (P = .014/0.005) and had fewer grade 3 or greater toxicities (P = .001). Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with disease-free survival (P = .035); 15% of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14/92) had a major pathologic response.

conclusionsTiming of chemotherapy, before or after surgery, is not associated with an improvement in overall or disease-free survival among patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer who undergo complete surgical resection.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPneumonectomyAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factorsadjuvant chemotherapyneoadjuvant chemotherapynon–small cell lung cancerpropensity-matched analysissurvival

Identifiers

PMID30415902
PMCPMC6344258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.