Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30415449›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2018

Assessment of 16S rRNA gene primers for studying bacterial community structure and function of aging flue-cured tobaccos.

Fan Wang, Xiao Men, Ge Zhang, Kaichao Liang, Yuhua Xin, Juan Wang, Aijun Li, Haibo Zhang, Haobao Liu, Lijun Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How the root bacterial community ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fan WangCAS Key Laboratory of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China.
Xiao MenCAS Key Laboratory of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China.
Ge ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China.
Kaichao LiangHainan Cigar Research Institute Hainan Provincial Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation, Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China.
Yuhua XinHainan Cigar Research Institute Hainan Provincial Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation, Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China.
Juan WangHainan Cigar Research Institute Hainan Provincial Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation, Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China.
Aijun LiHainan Cigar Research Institute Hainan Provincial Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation, Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China.
Haibo ZhangCAS Key Laboratory of Biobased Materials, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101, China. zhanghb@qibebt.ac.cn.
Haobao LiuHainan Cigar Research Institute Hainan Provincial Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation, Haikou, 571100, Hainan, China. liuhaobao@caas.cn.
Lijun WuYunnan Academy of Tobacco Sciences, Kunming, 650106, China. 2818429250@qq.com.
China Tobacco · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNQingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology · CNYunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Hainan's Key Project of Research and Development Plan ZDYF2017155Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 2017252Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Sciences Project 2017CP01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection of optimal primer pairs in 16S rRNA gene sequencing is a pivotal issue in microorganism diversity analysis. However, limited effort has been put into investigation of specific primer sets for analysis of the bacterial diversity of aging flue-cured tobaccos (AFTs), as well as prediction of the function of the bacterial community. In this study, the performance of four primer pairs in determining bacterial community structure based on 16S rRNA gene sequences in AFTs was assessed, and the functions of genes were predicted using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). Results revealed that the primer set 799F-1193R covering the amplification region V5V6V7 gave a more accurate picture of the bacterial community structure of AFTs, with lower co-amplification levels of chloroplast and mitochondrial genes, and more genera covered than when using the other primers. In addition, functional gene prediction suggested that the microbiome of AFTs was involved in kinds of interested pathways. A high abundance of functional genes involved in nitrogen metabolism was detected in AFTs, reflecting a high level of bacteria involved in degrading harmful nitrogen compounds and generating nitrogenous nutrients for others. Additionally, the functional genes involved in biosynthesis of valuable metabolites and degradation of toxic compounds provided information that the AFTs possess a huge library of microorganisms and genes that could be applied to further studies. All of these findings provide a significance reference for researchers working on the bacterial diversity assessment of tobacco-related samples.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencingAging flue-cured tobaccosFunctional profiling predictionMicrobial community diversityOptimal primer setsPICRUSt

Identifiers

PMID30415449
PMCPMC6230335
OpenAlexW2900326756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.