ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2019
An In Vitro Model for Conditioning Lesion Effect.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart-Specific Spinal and Vagal Afferents: Transcriptomic Signatures and Optogenetically Modulated Functional Coupling With Cardiomyocytes.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axons of a peripheral nerve grow faster after an axotomy if it attains a prior injury a few days earlier. This is called conditioning lesion effect (CLE) and very much valued since it may provide new insights into neuron biology and axonal regeneration. There are established in vivo experimental paradigms to study CLE, however, there is a need to have an in vitro conditioning technique where CLE occurs in a maximally controlled environment. Mouse primary sensory neurons were isolated from lumbar 4-5 dorsal root ganglia and incubated at 37 °C on a silicon-coated watch glass that prevents cell attachment. After this conditioning period they were transferred to laminin coated culture dishes. Similar cultures were set up with freshly isolated neurons from control animals and from the animals that received a sciatic nerve cut 3 days earlier. All preparations were placed on a live cell imaging microscopy providing physiological conditions and photographed for 48 h. Axonal regeneration and neuronal survival was assessed. During the conditioning incubation period neurons remained in suspended aggregates and did not grow axons. The regeneration rate of the in vitro conditioned neurons was much higher than the in vivo conditioned and control preparations during the first day of normal incubation. However, higher regeneration rates were compromised by progressive substantial neuronal death in both types of conditioned cultures but not in the control preparations. By using neutralizing antibodies, we demonstrated that activity of endogenous leukemia inhibitory factor is essential for induction of CLE in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.