Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30415301›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Differential diagnosis of pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma and metastatic colorectal carcinoma with the assistance of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

Jie Zhang, Chan Xiang, Yuchen Han, Haohua Teng, Xiaojing Li, Jinchen Shao, Lei Zhu, Han Han-Zhang, Junyi Ye, Keke Yu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Case report:Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Chan XiangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Yuchen HanDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Haohua TengDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Xiaojing LiDepartment of Pathology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Jinchen ShaoDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Lei ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Han Han-ZhangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Junyi YeBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Keke YuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China. ykkxx@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-7260
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNBurning Rock Biotech (China) · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC), defined as tumors with an enteric component exceeding 50% and a histological morphology similar to colorectal cancer (CRC) and metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCC), is an extremely rare primary lung adenocarcinoma, which was recently recognized by World Health Organization (WHO). Adenocarcinomas with intestinal differentiation have also been described in other anatomic sites, including paranasal sinuses, extrahepatic biliary tree, uterine and cervix, ovary. The morphologic spectrum and immunohistochemical profiles of PEAC overlap with those of colonic adenocarcinomas, the diagnosis of PEAC remains challenging. Currently, colonoscopy has to be performed to confirm the diagnosis, resulting in low compliance due to its invasiveness. Due to the rareness of PEAC, its molecular signature has not been comprehensively examined.

methodsIn this study, we investigated the molecular signatures associated with PEAC and its histological counterparts, CRC and MCC using capture-based targeted sequencing.

resultsWe revealed that 12/13 (92.31%) PEAC patients harbored mutations in well-established driver genes for non-small cell lung cancer and none of them had mutations unique to CRC. Furthermore, 13/15 (86.7%) of MCC harbored mutations that are frequently seen in CRC.

conclusionCollectively, our study showed that PEAC, exhibiting a similar mutational profile with NSCLC, showed a distinctive signature from CRC and MCC. Furthermore, we derived a classification model, intergrading both IHC markers and genetic signature, to accurately diagnose PEAC.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesMutation profileNext-generation sequencing (NGS)Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC)Pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma (MCC)

Identifiers

PMID30415301
PMCPMC11810349
OpenAlexW2900371938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.