Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30415276›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Combined ∆

Nnamdi G Nelson, Wen Xuan Law, Michael J Weingarten, Lauren N Carnevale, Aditi Das, Nu-Chu Liang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Self-administration of edible ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nnamdi G NelsonNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Wen Xuan LawDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 513 Psychology Bldg. 603 E. Daniel Street, M/C 716, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
Michael J WeingartenDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 513 Psychology Bldg. 603 E. Daniel Street, M/C 716, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.
Lauren N CarnevaleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Aditi DasNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Nu-Chu LiangNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. ncliang8@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-5533
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Biochemical Mechanism of Eicosanoid Synthesizing EnzymesR01GM115584 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI DAS, ADITI · 2017 to 2022
$1.7M
Mechanisms of metabolic and cognitive dysregulation after combined alcohol and THC useR21DA045175 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M, LIANG, NU-CHU · 2018 to 2019
$372k
Discovery of omega-3 endocannabinoid epoxides and elucidation of their neuroinflammatory propertiesR03DA042365 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI DAS, ADITI · 2017 to 2018
$143k
Consequences of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in adolescenceR03DA043701 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI LIANG, NU-CHU · 2018 to 2019
$122k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA042365NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA043701NIDA NIH HHS R03DA043701NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA045175NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115584NIH HHS R01GM115584-01A1NIH HHS R03DA042365-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleWhereas co-use of alcohol and marijuana is prevalent in adolescents, the effects of such drug co-exposure on ingestive and cognitive behaviors remain largely unexplored. We hypothesized that co-exposure to alcohol and ∆

methodsMale rats received daily THC (3-20 mg/kg/day) or oil vehicle through subcutaneous injection or consumption of a cookie with access to saccharin or saccharin-sweetened alcohol during adolescence (P30-45). Barnes maze and sucrose preference tests were applied to assess spatial memory and behavioral flexibility and abstinence-related anhedonia, respectively.

resultsSubcutaneous THC did not affect alcohol intake but dose-dependently increased acute (3 h) chow intake and reduced weight gain. Moderate alcohol consumption reduced the acute hyperphagic effect of subcutaneous THC. By contrast, oral THC at a dose > 5 mg/kg robustly reduced alcohol intake without affecting 3-h chow intake. At this dose, some rats stopped consuming the THC-laced cookies. Furthermore, oral THC reduced weight gain, and co-exposure to alcohol alleviated this effect. Chronic subcutaneous, but not oral, THC reduced sucrose intake during abstinence. Neither treatment impaired cognitive behaviors in the Barnes maze.

conclusionModerate alcohol and THC consumption can interact to elicit unique outcomes on ingestive behaviors and energy balance. Importantly, this study established a novel model of voluntary alcohol and THC consumption for studying mechanisms underlying the consequences of adolescent onset co-use of the two drugs.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolEthanolFeeding BehaviorHyperphagiaInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMaze LearningRatsRats, Long-EvansWeight GainDronabinolEthanol∆9-tetrahydrocannabinolAdolescenceAlcoholBarnes mazeCognitive functionIngestive behaviorPolydrug useSucrose preference

Identifiers

PMID30415276
PMCPMC6401297
OpenAlexW2899956551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.