Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30415228›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2019

Downstream vascular changes after flow-diverting device deployment in a rabbit model.

Praveen Kolumam Parameswaran, Daying Dai, Yong-Hong Ding, Matthew W Urban, Logan Manlove, Venkatachalem Sathish, Juan R Cebral, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of cerebral aneurysm size on distal intracranial hemodynamics and changes following flow diversion.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  2. L-Arginine reduces downstream vascular contractility after flow-diverting device deployment: A preliminary study in a rabbit model.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Praveen Kolumam ParameswaranApplied Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Daying DaiApplied Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Yong-Hong DingApplied Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Matthew W UrbanDivision of Radiology Research, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Logan ManlovePulmonary Cell Biology Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Venkatachalem SathishDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Juan R CebralDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
David F KallmesApplied Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ramanathan KadirvelApplied Neuroradiology Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USGeorge Mason University · USNorth Dakota State University · US

Funding

Computational and Biological Approach to Flow DiversionR01NS076491 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Juan R Cebral, DAVID F KALLMES · 2011 to 2026
$7.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow diverters (FDs) are increasingly used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, and carry the risk of thromboembolic complications, even in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. The effect of FDs on the downstream vascular is unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate vascular wall pulse wave velocity (PWV) and contractility changes following FD treatment in a rabbit model.

methodsFDs (Pipeline Embolic Device, Medtronic Inc., Irvine, California, USA) were implanted in the aorta of normal rabbits and sham-operated aorta were used as controls (n=6 per group). Pulse wave imaging with ultra-fast ultrasound at 1600 frames per second (Vantage, Verasonics, Inc., Kirkland, WA) was performed in the vessel wall distal to FD prior to device implantation and at 8- week follow-up to measure the PWV. Force contraction vascular reactivity studies were conducted in the aortic rings using an organ bath.

resultsThe difference in mean PWV in the follow-up compared with pre-implantation was significantly higher in the distal vessels compared with sham controls (1.18 m/s [SD=0.54] vs. 0.37 m/s [SD=1.09], P=0.03). Conversely, the aortic segments distal to the FD exhibited a 55% increase in vascular contractility compared with proximal segments (P=0.002). We observed a significant positive correlation between mean PWV and mean vascular contractility.

conclusionImplantation of FD was associated with increased PWV and vascular contractility, suggesting that FD implantation causes changes to the vascular wall. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical implication of changes in vascular PWV and contractility.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisCerebrovascular CirculationAnimalsAorta, ThoracicBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEmbolization, TherapeuticMuscle ContractionMuscle, Smooth, VascularPulse Wave AnalysisRabbitsaneurysmcomplicationflow diverterhemorrhagevessel wall

Identifiers

PMID30415228
PMCPMC6687513
OpenAlexW2899628277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.