ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019
Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.
Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distractor avoidance is achieved by active control rather than passive exclusion.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Signal suppression makes search less effortful.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring spatial and temporal constraints in suppression of distractors.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Dissociable Pupil and Oculomotor Markers of Attention Allocation and Distractor Suppression during Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Deficit in attentional capture by social-value related conditioned stimuli - a new perspective to understand the social-reward learning disorders among individuals with depressive symptoms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Looking for Details: Fine-Grained Visual Search at the Foveal Scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Older adults are impaired by distractors presented during working memory encoding.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Article
- Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- How robust is categorial distractor suppression? Assessing the impact of additional categories and increased set size.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Category-like representation of statistical regularities allows for stable distractor suppression.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Hyper-binding: the surprising roles of age and affect.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.Vision research · 2024Article
- The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The role of salience in the suppression of distracting stimuli.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.