Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414925›Full record

ArticleCell systems2018

Integration of Tumor Genomic Data with Cell Lines Using Multi-dimensional Network Modules Improves Cancer Pharmacogenomics.

James T Webber, Swati Kaushik, Sourav Bandyopadhyay

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Predicting patient response with models trained on cell lines and patient-derived xenografts by nonlinear transfer learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James T WebberDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Institute for Computational Health Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Swati KaushikDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Institute for Computational Health Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sourav BandyopadhyayDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Institute for Computational Health Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: sourav.bandyopadhyay@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

The Cancer Target Discovery and Development Network at UCSFU01CA217882 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, SOURAV, BIVONA, TREVER G · 2017 to 2021
$5.2M
Bay Area Cancer Target Discovery and Development NetworkU01CA168370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCORMICK, FRANK PATRICK, MCMANUS, MICHAEL T · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Physical and Genetic Interaction Landscape of the Tyrosine KinomeR01GM107671 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, SOURAV · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA168370NCI NIH HHS U01 CA217882NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging insights from genomic studies of patient tumors is limited by the discordance between these tumors and the cell line models used for functional studies. We integrate omics datasets using functional networks to identify gene modules reflecting variation between tumors and show that the structure of these modules can be evaluated in cell lines to discover clinically relevant biomarkers of therapeutic responses. Applied to breast cancer, we identify 219 gene modules that capture recurrent alterations and subtype patients and quantitate various cell types within the tumor microenvironment. Comparison of modules between tumors and cell lines reveals that many modules composed primarily of gene expression and methylation are poorly preserved. In contrast, preserved modules are highly predictive of drug responses in a manner that is robust and clinically relevant. This work addresses a fundamental challenge in pharmacogenomics that can only be overcome by the joint analysis of patient and cell line data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNA MethylationFemaleGenomicsHumansPharmacogeneticsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkersbreast cancerdata integrationnetworkspharmacogenomicstherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID30414925
PMCPMC6265063
OpenAlexW2899866452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.