Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414818›Full record

ReviewJACC. Heart failure2019

Initiation, Continuation, Switching, and Withdrawal of Heart Failure Medical Therapies During Hospitalization.

Aditi A Bhagat, Stephen J Greene, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Gregg C Fonarow, Javed Butler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Factors of Acute Heart Failure: A Regional Population Registry.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolving Decongestion Strategies in the Management of Acute Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aditi A BhagatDivision of Cardiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Stephen J GreeneDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Muthiah VaduganathanBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gregg C FonarowAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi. Electronic address: jbutler4@umc.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007604 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARK W FEINBERG · 1985 to 2026
$19.0M
Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007604NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) spend a large proportion of time in the hospital and other health care facilities. The benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in the outpatient setting have been shown in large randomized controlled trials. However, the decision to initiate, continue, switch, or withdraw HFrEF medications in the inpatient setting is often based on multiple factors and subject to significant variability across providers. Based on available data, in well-selected, treatment-naïve patients who are hemodynamically stable and clinically euvolemic after stabilization during hospitalization for HF, elements of GDMT can be safely initiated. Inpatient continuation of GDMT for HFrEF appears safe and well-tolerated in most hemodynamically stable patients. Hospitalization is also a potential time for switching from an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in eligible patients, and is the subject of ongoing study. Therapy withdrawal or need for dose reduction is rarely required, but if needed identifies a particularly at-risk group of patients with progressive HF. If recurrent intolerance to neurohormonal blockers is observed, these patients should be evaluated for advanced HF therapies. There is an enduring need for using the teachable moment of HFrEF hospitalization for optimal initiation, continuation, and switching of GDMT to improve post-discharge patient outcomes and the quality of chronic HFrEF care.

Indexed as

HospitalizationStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsClinical Decision-MakingDeprescriptionsDrug CombinationsDrug SubstitutionHeart FailureHumansMedication AdherenceMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsPractice Guidelines as TopicAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAminobutyratesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistssacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combinationTetrazolesValsartanheart failuremedical decision makingmedication adherencemedication discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID30414818
PMCPMC8053043
OpenAlexW2900360228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.