Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30414620›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2018

Aircraft noise and self-assessed mental health around a regional urban airport: a population based record linkage study.

David M Wright, Katherine Newell, Aideen Maguire, Dermot O'Reilly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Contribution of Environmental Science to Mental Health Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Aircraft Noise Reduction Strategies and Analysis of the Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Remote work: Aircraft noise implications, prediction, and management in the built environment.Applied acoustics. Acoustique applique. Angewandte Akustik · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Administrative Data Research Northern Ireland (ADR NI).International journal of population data science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David M WrightCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences - Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK. d.wright@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-3691
Katherine NewellCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences - Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Aideen MaguireCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences - Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Dermot O'ReillyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences - Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited evidence suggests that residential exposure to aircraft noise negatively influences population mental health around large airports, but it is not known whether the same is true for smaller airports. We investigated whether residential exposure to aircraft noise near a regional urban airport was associated with risk of chronic self-assessed mental ill health.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of 198,532 people aged 18 years and over living in Belfast, United Kingdom, enumerated at the 2011 Census. Residential exposure to aircraft noise (L

resultsPrevalence of self-assessed mental ill health was greater in high noise (≥57 dB) compared to low noise (< 54 dB) areas (12.4% vs. 9.7%). We found no association between aircraft noise and risk of mental ill health after adjustment for socio-economic status (high vs. low noise odds ratio: 1.03 CI: 0.93, 1.14). DISCUSSION: Associations between aircraft noise and mental health have been reported near large airports at similar average noise levels to those observed here. Our findings indicate that the noise environment around this smaller airport (with fewer flights and no night flights) has little influence on population mental health.

Indexed as

AircraftMental HealthNoise, TransportationAdolescentAdultAgedAirportsCitiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportUnited KingdomYoung AdultAircraft noiseMental healthRecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID30414620
PMCPMC6230376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.